Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27251567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

The changing shape of vaccination: improving immune responses through geometrical variations of a microdevice for immunization.

Michael Lawrence Crichton, David Alexander Muller, Alexandra Christina Isabelle Depelsenaire, Frances Elizabeth Pearson, Jonathan Wei, Jacob Coffey, Jin Zhang, Germain J P Fernando, Mark Anthony Fernance Kendall

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Micropuncture closure following high density microarray patch application in healthy subjects.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Lawrence CrichtonThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
David Alexander MullerThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Alexandra Christina Isabelle DepelsenaireThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Frances Elizabeth PearsonThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jonathan WeiThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jacob CoffeyThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jin ZhangThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Germain J P FernandoThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Mark Anthony Fernance KendallThe University of Queensland, Delivery of Drugs and Genes Group (D2G2), The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
University of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro-device use for vaccination has grown in the past decade, with the promise of ease-of-use, painless application, stable solid formulations and greater immune response generation. However, the designs of the highly immunogenic devices (e.g. the gene gun, Nanopatch or laser adjuvantation) require significant energy to enter the skin (30-90 mJ). Within this study, we explore a way to more effectively use energy for skin penetration and vaccination. These modifications change the Nanopatch projections from cylindrical/conical shapes with a density of 20,000 per cm(2) to flat-shaped protrusions at 8,000 per cm(2), whilst maintaining the surface area and volume that is placed within the skin. We show that this design results in more efficient surface crack initiations, allowing the energy to be more efficiently be deployed through the projections into the skin, with a significant overall increase in penetration depth (50%). Furthermore, we measured a significant increase in localized skin cell death (>2 fold), and resultant infiltrate of cells (monocytes and neutrophils). Using a commercial seasonal trivalent human influenza vaccine (Fluvax 2014), our new patch design resulted in an immune response equivalent to intramuscular injection with approximately 1000 fold less dose, while also being a practical device conceptually suited to widespread vaccination.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEquipment DesignFemaleHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntramuscularMiceMicroinjectionsMicrotechnologySpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsTransdermal PatchVaccinationInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27251567
PMCPMC4890175
OpenAlexW2421290276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.