Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27251514›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2016

Drug preparation, injection, and sharing practices in Tajikistan: a qualitative study in Kulob and Khorog.

David Otiashvili, Alisher Latypov, Irma Kirtadze, Umedjon Ibragimov, William Zule

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Abuse of tropicamide eye drops: review of clinical data.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David OtiashviliAddiction Research Center, Alternative Georgia, 14a Nutsubidze Str., Office 2, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia. dato@altgeorgia.ge.
Alisher LatypovGlobal Health Research Center of Central Asia, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Irma KirtadzeAddiction Research Center, Alternative Georgia, 14a Nutsubidze Str., Office 2, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Umedjon IbragimovRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William ZuleRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Columbia University · USEmory University · USIlia State University · GERTI International · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Pilot Test of an Intervention to Change Syringes Used by Injecting Drug UsersR34DA035094 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI ZULE, WILLIAM A · 2013 to 2015
$665k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA035094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSharing injection equipment remains an important rout of transmission of HIV and HCV infections in the region of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Tajikistan is one of the most affected countries with high rates of injection drug use and related epidemics.The aim of this qualitative study was to describe drug use practices and related behaviors in two Tajik cities - Kulob and Khorog.

methodsTwelve focus group discussions (6 per city) with 100 people who inject drugs recruited through needle and syringe program (NSP) outreach in May 2014. Topics covered included specific drugs injected, drug prices and purity, access to sterile equipment, safe injection practices and types of syringes and needles used. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 10 software.

resultsAll participants were male and ranged in age from 20 to 78 years. Thematic analysis showed that cheap Afghan heroin, often adulterated by dealers with other admixtures, was the only drug injected. Drug injectors often added Dimedrol (Diphenhydramine) to increase the potency of "low quality" heroin. NSPs were a major source of sterile equipment. Very few participants report direct sharing of needles and syringes. Conversely, many participants reported preparing drugs jointly and sharing injection paraphernalia. Using drugs in an outdoor setting and experiencing withdrawal were major contributors to sharing equipment, using non-sterile water, not boiling and not filtering the drug solution.

conclusionQualitative research can provide insights into risk behaviors that may be missed in quantitative studies. These finding have important implications for planning risk reduction interventions in Tajikistan. Prevention should specifically focus on indirect sharing practices.

Indexed as

Drug CompoundingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeedle SharingAdultAgedDrug UsersFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk-TakingSubstance Abuse, IntravenousTajikistanYoung AdultIndirect sharingInfection risksInjection drug useTajikistan

Identifiers

PMID27251514
PMCPMC4890278
OpenAlexW2418579306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.