Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27251487›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Extralaryngeal branching of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: a meta-analysis of 28,387 nerves.

Brandon Michael Henry, Jens Vikse, Matthew J Graves, Silvia Sanna, Beatrice Sanna, Iwona M Tomaszewska, R Shane Tubbs, Krzysztof A Tomaszewski

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical manifestations of injured tracheal and esophageal branches of the recurrent laryngeal nerve following thyroid surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brandon Michael HenryInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St, 31-034, Krakow, Poland. bmhenry55@gmail.com.
Jens VikseInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St, 31-034, Krakow, Poland.
Matthew J GravesInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St, 31-034, Krakow, Poland.
Silvia SannaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, S.S. 554, Bivio Sestu, 09042, Monserrato, CA, Sardinia, Italy.
Beatrice SannaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Cagliari, S.S. 554, Bivio Sestu, 09042, Monserrato, CA, Sardinia, Italy.
Iwona M TomaszewskaDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 16 św. Łazarza Street, 31-530, Krakow, Poland.
R Shane TubbsSeattle Science Foundation, 550 17th Ave, James Tower, Suite 600, Seattle, WA, 28122, USA.
Krzysztof A TomaszewskiInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St, 31-034, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) are branches of the vagus nerve that go on to innervate most of the intrinsic muscles of the larynx. Historically, the RLN has been considered to branch after it enters the larynx, but numerous studies have demonstrated that it often branches before. The wide variability of this extralaryngeal branching (ELB) has significant implications for the risk of iatrogenic injury. We aimed to assess the anatomical characteristics of ELB comprehensively.

methodsArticles on the ELB of the RLN were identified by a comprehensive database search. Relevant data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis of the prevalence of branching, branching pattern, distance of ELB point from the larynx, and presence of positive motor signals in anterior and posterior ELB branches.

resultsA total of 69 articles (n = 28,387 nerves) from both intraoperative and cadaveric modalities were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of ELB was 60.0 % (95 % CI 52.0-67.7). Cadaveric and intraoperative subgroups differed with prevalence rates of 73.3 % (95 % CI 61.0-84.0) and 39.2 % (95 % CI 29.0-49.9), respectively. Cadavers most often presented with a ELB pattern of bifurcation, with a prevalence of 61.1 %, followed by no branching at 23.4 %. Branching of the RLN occurred most often at a distance of 1-2 cm (74.8 % of cases) prior to entering the larynx. A positive motor signal was most often noted in anterior RLN branches (99.9 %) but only in 1.5 % of posterior branches.

conclusionsThe anatomy of the RLN is highly variable, and ELB is likely to have been underreported in intraoperative studies. Because of its high likelihood, the possibility of ELB needs to be assessed in patients to prevent iatrogenic injury and long-term postoperative complications.

Indexed as

HumansIntraoperative ComplicationsRecurrent Laryngeal NerveRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve InjuriesAnatomic variationsExtralaryngeal branchingRecurrent laryngeal nerveSurgeryThyroid

Identifiers

PMID27251487
PMCPMC5086344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.