Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27250911›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Beyond cones: an improved model of whisker bending based on measured mechanics and tapering.

Samuel Andrew Hires, Adam Schuyler, Jonathan Sy, Vincent Huang, Isis Wyche, Xiyue Wang, David Golomb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Whisker-Implanted Biomimetic Electronic Skin for Tactile Sensing and Blind Perception.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Euler spiral of rat whiskers.Science advances · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Design principles of hair-like structures as biological machines.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel Andrew HiresNeurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; shires@usc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3498-0388
Adam SchuylerNeurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
Jonathan SyNeurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
Vincent HuangNeurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
Isis WycheNeurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
Xiyue WangNeurobiology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;
David GolombJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia; and Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Department of Physics, and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Be'er-Sheva, Israel.
University of Southern California · USBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of touch is represented by neural activity patterns evoked by mechanosensory input forces. The rodent whisker system is exceptional for studying the neurophysiology of touch in part because these forces can be precisely computed from video of whisker deformation. We evaluate the accuracy of a standard model of whisker bending, which assumes quasi-static dynamics and a linearly tapered conical profile, using controlled whisker deflections. We find significant discrepancies between model and experiment: real whiskers bend more than predicted upon contact at locations in the middle of the whisker and less at distal locations. Thus whiskers behave as if their stiffness near the base and near the tip is larger than expected for a homogeneous cone. We assess whether contact direction, friction, inhomogeneous elasticity, whisker orientation, or nonconical shape could explain these deviations. We show that a thin-middle taper of mouse whisker shape accounts for the majority of this behavior. This taper is conserved across rows and columns of the whisker array. The taper has a large effect on the touch-evoked forces and the ease with which whiskers slip past objects, which are key drivers of neural activity in tactile object localization and identification. This holds for orientations with intrinsic whisker curvature pointed toward, away from, or down from objects, validating two-dimensional models of simple whisker-object interactions. The precision of computational models relating sensory input forces to neural activity patterns can be quantitatively enhanced by taking thin-middle taper into account with a simple corrective function that we provide.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFemaleFunctional LateralityMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMovementNonlinear DynamicsPhysical StimulationTouchVibrissaemechanicsquasi-static modelsomatosensationstiffnesswhisker bending

Identifiers

PMID27250911
PMCPMC4995282
OpenAlexW2415234691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.