ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016
Quality of life outcomes in peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Animal models, treatment options, and biomaterials for female stress urinary incontinence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPeri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection is an established treatment for patients with stress urinary incontinence. Information is limited regarding calcium hydroxylapatite treatment and quality of life (QOL) outcomes. We hypothesize that patients might improve QOL after peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection, which was reflected in validated questionnaires.
methodsThe peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injection billing code was used to identify patients who underwent injection from 2011-2013. Female patients who completed the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS), the AUASS QOL and Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI), and the bother score (M-ISI bother), or pad count at baseline and follow-up were included. Change in questionnaire scores and pads were assessed using the paired t test.
resultsSixty patients underwent 1 (30), 2 (63) or 3 (7 %) peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injections performed by a single surgeon. Thirty-seven patients provided questionnaires and 38 provided pad counts, all with a mean age of 75 years. The overall AUASS, AUASS QOL, and overall M-ISI scores improved in 67.6, 54.8, and 61.3 % respectively (4.5 ± 7.9, 1.3 ± 1.7 and 5.5 ± 8.6 respectively). The M-ISI bother score improved in 44.8 % with a mean improvement of 0.5 ± 2.9, but did not reach significance. There was a 1.7 ± 3.7 decrease in the mean number of pads used daily after the procedure (p = 0.006) and 19 % experienced transient urinary retention.
conclusionsPeri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite injections can improve urinary QOL scores in patients with initial and recurrent stress urinary incontinence. This short-term retrospective analysis suggests that larger long-term studies focusing on QOL outcomes are needed to evaluate the effect of peri-urethral calcium hydroxylapatite has on incontinence-specific QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.