Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27250635›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2016

Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration.

Graham G Walmsley, Ryan C Ransom, Elizabeth R Zielins, Tripp Leavitt, John S Flacco, Michael S Hu, Andrew S Lee, Michael T Longaker, Derrick C Wan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Standardised Matrices for Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Graham G WalmsleyHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
Ryan C RansomHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
Elizabeth R ZielinsHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
Tripp LeavittHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
John S FlaccoHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
Michael S HuHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
Andrew S LeeInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Hagey Building, 257 Campus Dr., Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Michael T LongakerHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA.
Derrick C WanHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive Room GK106, Stanford, CA, 94305-5461, USA. dwan@stanford.edu.

Funding

Defining BMP-responsive lncRNA for bone regenerationK08DE024269 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAN, DERRICK · 2014 to 2018
$632k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE024269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone has the capacity to regenerate and repair itself. However, this capacity may be impaired or lost depending on the size of the defect or the presence of certain disease states. In this review, we discuss the key principles underlying bone healing, efforts to characterize bone stem and progenitor cell populations, and the current status of translational and clinical studies in cell-based bone tissue engineering. Though barriers to clinical implementation still exist, the application of stem and progenitor cell populations to bone engineering strategies has the potential to profoundly impact regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone RegenerationHumansRegenerative MedicineStem CellsTissue EngineeringBoneEngineeringRegenerationStem cellTissue

Identifiers

PMID27250635
PMCPMC5053855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.