Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27250617›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

The osteoblast as an inflammatory cell: production of cytokines in response to bacteria and components of bacterial biofilms.

Ulrike Dapunt, Thomas Giese, Sabine Stegmaier, Arash Moghaddam, Gertrud Maria Hänsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Secretome analysis and virulence assessment inJournal of oral microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Human Osteoblast-Conditioned Media Can InfluenceInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The osteoblast secretome inFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrike DapuntCenter for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany. Ulrike.Dapunt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Thomas GieseInstitute for Immunology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Sabine StegmaierInstitute for Immunology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Arash MoghaddamHTRG Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, Heidelberg, 69118, Germany.
Gertrud Maria HänschInstitute for Immunology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplant infections are a major complication in the field of orthopaedics. Bacteria attach to the implant-surface and form biofilm-colonies which makes them difficult to treat. Not only immune cells exclusively respond to bacterial challenges, but also local tissue cells are capable of participating in defense mechanisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of osteoblasts in the context of implant infections.

methodsPrimary osteoblasts were cultivated and stimulated with free-swimming bacteria at 4 °C and 37 °C. Supernatants were harvested for ELISA and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines evaluated by RT-PCR. Bacterial binding to osteoblasts was evaluated using cytofluorometry and uptake was investigated by (3)H thymidine-labelling of bacteria. Osteoblasts were additionally stimulated with the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms, as well as components of the EPS; the bacterial heat shock protein GroEL in particular.

resultsWe demonstrated that binding of bacteria to the osteoblast cell surface leads to an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Bacteria are capable of surviving intracellular. Furthermore, osteoblasts do not only respond to free-swimming, planktonic bacteria, but also to components of the EPS, including lipoteichoic acid and the heat shock protein GroEL.

conclusionIn conclusion, local tissue cells, specifically osteoblasts, might contribute to the persistence of the inflammatory response associated with implant-infections.

Indexed as

BiofilmsChaperonin 60CytokinesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansLipopolysaccharidesOsteoblastsPhagocytosisPrimary Cell CultureProsthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisTeichoic AcidsChaperonin 60CytokinesLipopolysaccharideslipoteichoic acidTeichoic AcidsBiofilm infectionExtracellular polymeric substanceGroELOsteoblast

Identifiers

PMID27250617
PMCPMC4890488
OpenAlexW2412222347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.