Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27249102›Full record

ArticleAging2016

Epigenetic age predictions based on buccal swabs are more precise in combination with cell type-specific DNA methylation signatures.

Monika Eipel, Felix Mayer, Tanja Arent, Marcelo R P Ferreira, Carina Birkhofer, Uwe Gerstenmaier, Ivan G Costa, Stefanie Ritz-Timme, Wolfgang Wagner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantification of Epigenetic Aging in Public Health.Annual review of public health · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Epigenetic analyses in forensic medicine: future and challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika EipelHelmholtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Stem Cell Biology and Cellular Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Felix MayerInstitute for Legal Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tanja ArentInstitute for Legal Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marcelo R P FerreiraDepartment of Statistics, Centre for Natural and Exact Sciences, Federal University of Paraiba, 58051-900, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Carina BirkhoferVarionostic GmbH, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Uwe GerstenmaierVarionostic GmbH, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Ivan G CostaInstitute for Biomedical Engineering - Cell Biology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Stefanie Ritz-TimmeInstitute for Legal Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang WagnerHelmholtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Stem Cell Biology and Cellular Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is reflected by highly reproducible DNA methylation (DNAm) changes that open new perspectives for estimation of chronological age in legal medicine. DNA can be harvested non-invasively from cells at the inside of a person's cheek using buccal swabs - but these specimens resemble heterogeneous mixtures of buccal epithelial cells and leukocytes with different epigenetic makeup. In this study, we have trained an age predictor based on three age-associated CpG sites (associated with the genesPDE4C, ASPA, and ITGA2B) for swab samples to reach a mean absolute deviation (MAD) between predicted and chronological age of 4.3 years in a training set and of 7.03 years in a validation set. Subsequently, the composition of buccal epithelial cells versus leukocytes was estimated by two additional CpGs (associated with the genes CD6 and SERPINB5). Results of this "Buccal-Cell-Signature" correlated with cell counts in cytological stains (R2 = 0.94). Combination of cell type-specific and age-associated CpGs into one multivariate model enabled age predictions with MADs of 5.09 years and 5.12 years in two independent validation sets. Our results demonstrate that the cellular composition in buccal swab samples can be determined by DNAm at two cell type-specific CpGs to improve epigenetic age predictions.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAmidohydrolasesChildChild, PreschoolCpG IslandsCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4DNAFemaleHumansInfantIntegrin alpha2AmidohydrolasesaspartoacylaseCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4DNAIntegrin alpha2ITGA2B protein, humanPDE4C protein, humanagingcell compositionepigeneticepithelial cellsmethylationpredictorswab

Identifiers

PMID27249102
PMCPMC4931852
OpenAlexW2412624897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.