Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27248827›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Validation study for the hypothesis of internal mammary sentinel lymph node lymphatic drainage in breast cancer.

Bin-Bin Cong, Peng-Fei Qiu, Yan-Bing Liu, Tong Zhao, Peng Chen, Xiao-Shan Cao, Chun-Jian Wang, Zhao-Peng Zhang, Xiao Sun, Jin-Ming Yu and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Incidental dose to internal mammary nodes in post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bin-Bin CongSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Peng-Fei QiuBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yan-Bing LiuBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Tong ZhaoBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Peng ChenBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiao-Shan CaoSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chun-Jian WangBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhao-Peng ZhangBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiao SunBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jin-Ming YuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yong-Sheng WangBreast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shandong University · CNShandong First Medical University · CNShandong Tumor Hospital · CNUniversity of Jinan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to axilla sentinel lymph node lymphatic drainage pattern, we hypothesized that internal mammary sentinel lymph node (IM-SLN) receives lymphatic drainage from not only the primary tumor area, but also the entire breast parenchyma. Based on the hypothesis a modified radiotracer injection technique was established and could increase the visualization rate of the IM-SLN significantly. To verify the hypothesis, two kinds of tracers were injected at different sites of breast. The radiotracer was injected with the modified technique, and the fluorescence tracer was injected in the peritumoral intra-parenchyma. The location of IM-SLN was identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe. Then, internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) was performed. The fluorescence status of IM-SLN was identified by the fluorescence imaging system. A total of 216 patients were enrolled from September 2013 to July 2015. The overall visualization rate of IM-SLN was 71.8% (155/216). The success rate of IM-SLNB was 97.3% (145/149). The radiotracer and the fluorescence tracer were identified in the same IM-SLN in 127 cases, the correlation and the agreement is significant (Case-base, rs=0.836, P<0.001; Kappa=0.823, P<0.001). Different tracers injected into the different sites of the intra-parenchyma reached the same IM-SLN, which demonstrates the hypothesis that IM-SLN receives the lymphatic drainage from not only the primary tumor area but also the entire breast parenchyma.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAxillaBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFluorescent DyesHumansIndocyanine GreenIodineLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesFluorescent DyesIndocyanine GreenIodinebreast cancerindocyanine greeninternal mammarysentinel lymph node biopsyvisualization rate

Identifiers

PMID27248827
PMCPMC5173111
OpenAlexW2407082002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.