Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27248769›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)2016

Random start or emergency IVF/in vitro maturation: a new rapid approach to fertility preservation.

David Mark Robertson, Robert B Gilchrist, William Leigh Ledger, Angela Baerwald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ovarian Stimulation Is Safe and Effective for Patients with Gynecologic Cancer.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. OocyteTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David Mark RobertsonSchool of Women's & Children's Health, Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Robert B GilchristSchool of Women's & Children's Health, Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
William Leigh LedgerSchool of Women's & Children's Health, Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Angela BaerwaldDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
UNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need to develop rapid protocols for ovarian stimulation for women who wish to preserve their fertility following diagnosis of cancer. Conventional gonadotropin stimulation protocols are lengthy and are delayed until the start of the next menstrual period, potentially compromising cancer treatments. The development of random start IVF/in vitro maturation has made significant strides for enabling couples undergoing cancer therapy to achieve a family. However, several unanswered questions still remain. What do we know about the endocrinology of stimulating ovarian follicular activity outside the established protocols of stimulation during the follicular phase? This article explores what is known about antral follicle development during the menstrual cycle, novel ovarian stimulation proposals for optimizing assisted reproductive therapies in women, and direction.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleNeoplasmsReproductive Techniques, AssistedTreatment OutcomefolliculogenesisFSH stimulationIVMletrozole

Identifiers

PMID27248769
PMCPMC5384505
OpenAlexW2414092827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.