Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247961›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2016

Analysis of a large choroideremia dataset does not suggest a preference for inclusion of certain genotypes in future trials of gene therapy.

Paul R Freund, Yuri V Sergeev, Ian M MacDonald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Synonymous Variant in the CHM Gene Causes Aberrant Splicing in Choroideremia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul R FreundDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Yuri V SergeevOphthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch National Eye Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland.
Ian M MacDonaldDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
University of Alberta · CANational Eye Institute · US

Funding

Proteins From Hereditary Eye Diseases: In-silico and Experimental StudiesZIAEY000476 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI SERGEEV, YURI · 2009 to 2025
$16.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChoroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium, photoreceptors, and choroid, which causes nyctalopia and progressive constriction of visual fields leading to blindness. The CHM gene encodes Rab escort protein 1 (REP-1). In this work, we reviewed the phenotypes and genotypes of affected males with the purpose of understanding the functional effects of CHM mutations and their relationship with the phenotypes.

methodsA retrospective review of 128 affected males was performed analyzing the onset of symptoms, visual acuity, and visual fields with respect to their mutations in the CHM gene.

resultsIn rank order, reflecting data from this report, the most common mutations found in the CHM gene were nonsense mutations (41%), exon deletions (37%), and splice sites (14%) associated with a loss of functional protein. In the pool of 106 CHM mutations, we discovered four novel missense mutations (c.238C>T; p.L80F, c.819G>T; p.Q273H, c.1327A>G; p.M443V, and c.1370C>T; p.L457P) predicted to be severe changes affecting protein stability and folding with the effect similar to that of other types of mutations. No significant genotype-phenotype correlation was found with respect to the onset of nyctalopia, the onset of other visual symptoms, visual acuity, or width of visual fields.

conclusionThere is no evidence to support exclusion of CHM patients from clinical trials based on their genotypes or any potential genotype-phenotype correlations.

Indexed as

Choroideremianatural historyRab escort protein‐1retinal dystrophyvisual acuityvisual fields

Identifiers

PMID27247961
PMCPMC4867567
OpenAlexW2289292318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.