Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247803›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2016

Olfactory Bulb Field Potentials and Respiration in Sleep-Wake States of Mice.

Jakob Jessberger, Weiwei Zhong, Jurij Brankačk, Andreas Draguhn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intranasal Pressure Recording for Monitoring Mouse Respiration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal Relations between Cortical Network Oscillations and Breathing Frequency during REM Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Respiratory regulation & interactions with neuro-cognitive circuitry.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jakob JessbergerInstitute for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Weiwei ZhongInstitute for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jurij BrankačkInstitute for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas DraguhnInstitute for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that local field potentials (LFP) in the rodent olfactory bulb (OB) follow respiration. This respiration-related rhythm (RR) in OB depends on nasal air flow, indicating that it is conveyed by sensory inputs from the nasal epithelium. Recently RR was found outside the olfactory system, suggesting that it plays a role in organizing distributed network activity. It is therefore important to measure RR and to delineate it from endogenous electrical rhythms like theta which cover similar frequency bands in small rodents. In order to validate such measurements in freely behaving mice, we compared rhythmic LFP in the OB with two respiration-related biophysical parameters: whole-body plethysmography (PG) and nasal temperature (thermocouple; TC). During waking, all three signals reflected respiration with similar reliability. Peak power of RR in OB decreased with increasing respiration rate whereas power of PG increased. During NREM sleep, respiration-related TC signals disappeared and large amplitude slow waves frequently concealed RR in OB. In this situation, PG provided a reliable signal while breathing-related rhythms in TC and OB returned only during microarousals. In summary, local field potentials in the olfactory bulb do reliably reflect respiratory rhythm during wakefulness and REM sleep but not during NREM sleep.

Indexed as

RespirationAnimalsCircadian RhythmFemaleMaleMiceNeuronsOlfactory BulbSleepWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID27247803
PMCPMC4877487
OpenAlexW2364556618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.