Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247630›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology2016

Novel immunotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

Akhil Muthigi, Arvin K George, Sam J Brancato, Piyush K Agarwal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. New therapies in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer treatment.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akhil MuthigiUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Arvin K GeorgeUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sam J BrancatoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Piyush K AgarwalUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10- Hatfield CRC, Room 2-5952, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has long played a role in urothelial cancers with the use of bacille Calmette Guérin (BCG) being a mainstay in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Novel therapeutic approaches have not significantly impacted mortality in this population and so a renaissance in immunotherapy has resulted. This includes recombinant BCG, oncolytic viruses, monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, and adoptive T-cell therapy. Herein, we provide a review of the current state of the art and future therapies regarding immunotherapeutic strategies for urothelial carcinoma.

Indexed as

immunotherapyNMIBCurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27247630
PMCPMC4872187
OpenAlexW2263116024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.