ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology2016
Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in the management of Peyronie's disease: a review of the evidence.
Review in Therapeutic advances in urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of collagenase clostridium histolyticum on adhesion reduction in a rat knee arthrofibrosis model.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2021Article
- Outcomes of Surgery in Peyronie's Disease Following Intralesional Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Injections.Current urology reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPeyronie's disease (PD) is a connective tissue disorder resulting in the abnormal accumulation of scar or plaques in the tunica albuginea of the penis. The condition is characterized by two phases: an active, inflammatory phase, and a stable, chronic phase. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) was isolated in the mid-1900s and postulated as a potential pharmacologic strategy for breaking down the abnormal connective tissue plaques of PD. Prior to the introduction of CCH, a wide variety of treatment modalities for PD were used in clinical practice, including oral and topical medications, intralesional injections, electromotive drug administration, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, traction, and invasive surgery, all with variable results. This review aims to examine the known data surrounding the use of intralesional CCH injections in the treatment of PD.
methodsCCH is a recently US Food and Drug Administration approved pharmacologic treatment for PD. Clinical trials using intralesional CCH injection therapy for the treatment of PD were reviewed for clinical safety and efficacy of treatment.
resultsStudies demonstrated that CCH treatment administered in multiple cycles led to significant benefit in both the psychological and physical aspects of PD. The strongest evidence for CCH's effectiveness was revealed in large, multicenter randomized controlled trials (Investigation for Maximal Peyronie's Reduction Efficacy and Safety Studies I and II) in which intralesional CCH was combined with manual modeling of the penis. Although adverse events from treatment are relatively common, the majority are mild to moderate in degree, including penile pain, swelling, and bruising, which all resolve spontaneously.
conclusionOverall, evidence indicates that CCH is a valuable, effective, and safe minimally invasive treatment option for men with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.