Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247539›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2016

Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Leak.

Michael S Thomas, David A Margolin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03941938 (Prevention of Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery by Glue Reinforcement. A Prospective Randomized Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03941938 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery by Glue Reinforcement. A Prospective Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSocieta Italiana di Chirurgia ColoRettaleRan2019 to 2021Enrolled140ConditionsRectal CancerArmsCyanoacrylate reinforcement, No reinforcement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical progress and prospects of biodegradable intestinal stents.American journal of translational research · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Assessment and Techniques for Endoscopic Closure.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael S ThomasDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, University of Queensland Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana.
David A MargolinDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, University of Queensland Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ochsner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present strategies for preventing and managing the failure of the surgical restoration of intestinal continuity. Despite improvements in surgical technique and perioperative care, anastomotic leaks still occur, and with them occur increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and costs. Due to the devastating consequences for patients with failed anastomoses, there have been a myriad of materials and techniques used by surgeons to create better intestinal anastomoses. We will also discuss the management strategies for anastomotic leak when they do inevitably occur.

Indexed as

anastomosisleakrisk factorstesting

Identifiers

PMID27247539
PMCPMC4882170
OpenAlexW2405618455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.