ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016
How to tune an enhancer.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The combinatorial binding syntax of transcription factors in forebrain-specific enhancers.Biology open · 2025Article
- The Non-continuum Nature of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Enhancer grammar in development, evolution, and disease: dependencies and interplay.Developmental cell · 2021Review
- Nuclear Receptors, Ligands and the Mammalian B Cell.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- From Influenza Virus Infections to Lupus: Synchronous Estrogen ReceptorViral immunology · 2020Article
- Matters of life and death: How estrogen and estrogen receptor binding to the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus may influence outcomes of infection, allergy, and autoimmune disease.Cellular immunology · 2019Review
- Added value of autoregulation and multi-step kinetics of transcription initiation.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Mutational analysis of a Drosophila neuroblast enhancer governing nubbin expression during CNS development.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2018Article
- DNA Sequence Constraints Define Functionally Active Steroid Nuclear Receptor Binding Sites in Chromatin.Endocrinology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.