Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247202›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2016

Stated product formulation preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among women in the VOICE-D (MTN-003D) study.

Ellen H Luecke, Helen Cheng, Kubashni Woeber, Teopista Nakyanzi, Imelda C Mudekunye-Mahaka, Ariane van der Straten, MTN-003D Study Team

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02358616 (An Exploratory Study of Potential Sources of Efficacy Dilution in the VOICE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02358616 completednot on this map

An Exploratory Study of Potential Sources of Efficacy Dilution in the VOICE Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorMicrobicide Trials NetworkRan2012 to 2014Enrolled219ConditionsHIV Prevention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ellen H LueckeWomen's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA; eluecke@rti.org.
Helen ChengWomen's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kubashni WoeberSouth African Medical Research Council, HIV Prevention Research Unit, Durban, South Africa.
Teopista NakyanziMakerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Imelda C Mudekunye-MahakaUZ-UCSF Collaborative Research Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ariane van der StratenWomen's Global Health Imperative (WGHI) RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
MTN-003D Study Team

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
The Johns Hopkins University - Uganda Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069530 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARY Glenn Fowler, Philippa Musoke · 2012 to 2026
$34.8M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069530NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) requires consistent and correct product use, thus a deeper understanding of women's stated product formulation preferences, and the correlates of those preferences, can help guide future research. VOICE-D (MTN-003D), a qualitative ancillary study conducted after the VOICE trial, retrospectively explored participants' tablet and gel use, as well as their preferences for other potential PrEP product formulations.

methodsWe conducted an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data from VOICE-D participants. During in-depth interviews, women were presented with pictures and descriptions of eight potential PrEP product formulations, including the oral tablet and vaginal gel tested in VOICE, and asked to discuss which product formulations they would prefer to use and why. Seven of the original product formulations displayed were combined into preferred product formulation categories based on exploratory factor and latent class analyses. We examined demographic and behavioural correlates of these preferred product formulation categories. In-depth interviews with participants were conducted, coded, and analysed for themes related to product preference.

resultsOf the 68 female participants who completed in-depth interviews (22 South Africa, 24 Zimbabwe, 22 Uganda), median age was 28 (range 21-41), 81% were HIV negative, and 49% were married or living with a partner. Four preferred product formulation categories were identified via exploratory factor analysis: 1) oral tablets; 2) vaginal gel; 3) injectable, implant, or vaginal ring; and 4) vaginal film or suppository. A majority of women (81%) expressed a preference for product formulations included in category 3. Characteristics significantly associated with each preferred product category differed. Attributes described by participants as being important in a preferred product formulation included duration of activity, ease of use, route of administration, clinic- versus self-administration, and degree of familiarity with product.

conclusionsWhile there was interest in a variety of potential PrEP product formulations, a majority of VOICE-D participants preferred long-acting methods. More research is needed to gain insight into end-users' product formulation preference to inform messaging and market segmentation for different PrEP products and resources to invest in products that target populations are most interested in using. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02358616.

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultDrug CompoundingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersSouth AfricaUgandaVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesZimbabweVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesAfricaHIV preventionoral pre-exposure prophylaxispreferencesproduct delivery formsvaginal microbicideswomen

Identifiers

PMID27247202
PMCPMC4887458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.