Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247129›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Automated prostate tissue referencing for cancer detection and diagnosis.

Jin Tae Kwak, Stephen M Hewitt, André Alexander Kajdacsy-Balla, Saurabh Sinha, Rohit Bhargava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Web engine for tumor pathology image retrievals on massive scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An EM-based semi-supervised deep learning approach for semantic segmentation of histopathological images from radical prostatectomies.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Multiview boosting digital pathology analysis of prostate cancer.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin Tae KwakDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, Korea.
Stephen M HewittTissue Array Research Program, Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA.
André Alexander Kajdacsy-BallaDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Saurabh SinhaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2122 Siebel Center, 201 N. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. sinhas@illinois.edu.
Rohit BhargavaBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Department of Bioengineering, Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 4265 Beckman Institute 405 N. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. rxb@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USNational Cancer Institute · USSejong University · KRUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Infrared microscopy for a systems approach to prostate pathologyR01CA138882 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BHARGAVA, ROHIT · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current practice of histopathology review is limited in speed and accuracy. The current diagnostic paradigm does not fully describe the complex and complicated patterns of cancer. To address these needs, we develop an automated and objective system that facilitates a comprehensive and easy information management and decision-making. We also develop a tissue similarity measure scheme to broaden our understanding of tissue characteristics.

resultsThe system includes a database of previously evaluated prostate tissue images, clinical information and a tissue retrieval process. In the system, a tissue is characterized by its morphology. The retrieval process seeks to find the closest matching cases with the tissue of interest. Moreover, we define 9 morphologic criteria by which a pathologist arrives at a histomorphologic diagnosis. Based on the 9 criteria, true tissue similarity is determined and serves as the gold standard of tissue retrieval. Here, we found a minimum of 4 and 3 matching cases, out of 5, for ~80 % and ~60 % of the queries when a match was defined as the tissue similarity score ≥5 and ≥6, respectively. We were also able to examine the relationship between tissues beyond the Gleason grading system due to the tissue similarity scoring system.

conclusionsProviding the closest matching cases and their clinical information with pathologists will help to conduct consistent and reliable diagnoses. Thus, we expect the system to facilitate quality maintenance and quality improvement of cancer pathology.

Indexed as

AutomationDatabases, FactualHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsDatabaseDecision supportInfrared imagingProstate cancerTissue morphologyTissue retrieval

Identifiers

PMID27247129
PMCPMC4888626
OpenAlexW4254784140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.