Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247122›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2017

Barriers and facilitators to the use of an immunization application: a qualitative study supplemented with Google Analytics data.

Kathleen Burgess, Katherine M Atkinson, Jacqueline Westeinde, Natasha Crowcroft, Shelley L Deeks, Kumanan Wilson, Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Program Delivery and Evaluation Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathleen BurgessClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaK1Y 4E9.
Katherine M AtkinsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9.
Jacqueline WesteindeClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, CanadaK1Y 4E9.
Natasha CrowcroftPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shelley L DeeksPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kumanan WilsonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9.
Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Program Delivery and Evaluation Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Barriers and facilitators of mobile app adoption are not known. This study examined usage of a new Pan-Canadian immunization app to identify factors that contributed to usage. Methods: Women in their third trimester of pregnancy or had given birth in the previous 3 months were recruited from a hospital obstetrical unit. Fifty-five participants were instructed to download the ImmunizeCA app. After at least 6 months, 10 interviews were conducted, transcribed and coded. Themes identified were compared with aggregate ImmunizeCA usage data (n = 74 212 users). Results: Facilitators included features that address logistical challenges, improved convenience and information access. Barriers included absence of system integration. Concerns regarding the privacy and security of personal health information were not an inhibitor as long as best practices are followed. Google Analytics data on usage supported qualitative findings. Conclusion: Future studies should evaluate the quantitative impact of factors we identified on app uptake and usage. Subsequent mobile app studies may benefit from the use of analytic data as they were found to be effective in helping to validate qualitative data derived from interviews with study participants.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdultFemaleHumansImmunizationInterviews as TopicPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyQualitative Researchimmunizationmobile applicationsprivacypublic healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID27247122
PMCPMC5939700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.