Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27247065›Full record

ArticleThe Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research2016

Sero-epidemiological survey and risk factors associated with bovine brucellosis among slaughtered cattle in Nigeria.

Victor O Akinseye, Hezekiah K Adesokan, Akwoba J Ogugua, Folashade J Adedoyin, Patricia I Otu, Ayi V Kwaghe, Noah O Kolawole, Oyinye J Okoro, Charity A Agada, Adeniyi O Tade and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Seroprevalence, and molecular detection ofInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and Spatial Distribution of Animal Brucellosis in Central Punjab, Pakistan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Victor O Akinseye
Hezekiah K Adesokan
Akwoba J Ogugua
Folashade J Adedoyin
Patricia I Otu
Ayi V Kwaghe
Noah O Kolawole
Oyinye J Okoro
Charity A Agada
Adeniyi O Tade
Olufemi O Faleke
Anyanwu L Okeke
Ibikunle M Akanbi
Mofoluwake M Ibitoye
Morenike O Dipeolu
Emma J Dale
Perrett Lorraine
Andrew V Taylor
Emmanuel A Awosanya
Eniola O Cadmus
Judy A Stack
Simeon I CadmusDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan. simeonc5@gmail.com.
University of Ibadan · NGAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBFederal University of Agriculture · NGMinistry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries · KENational Veterinary Research Institute · NGUniversity of Maiduguri · NGUsmanu Danfodiyo University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine brucellosis is endemic in Nigeria; however, limited data exist on nationwide studies and risk factors associated with the disease. Using a cross-sectional sero-epidemiological survey, we determined the prevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis in slaughtered cattle in three geographical regions of Nigeria. Serum samples from randomly selected unvaccinated cattle slaughtered over a period of 3 years (between December 2010 and September 2013) from northern, southern and south-western Nigeria were tested for antibodies to Brucella abortus using the Rose Bengal test. Data associated with risk factors of brucellosis were analysed by Stata Version 12. In all, 8105 cattle were screened. An overall seroprevalence of 3.9% (315/8105) was recorded by the Rose Bengal test, with 3.8%, 3.4% and 4.0% from the northern, southern and south-western regions, respectively. Bivariate analysis showed that cattle screened in northern Nigeria were less likely to be seropositive for antibodies to Brucella spp. than those from south-western Nigeria (odds ratio = 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.22). However, logistic regression analysis revealed that breed ( p = 0.04) and sex ( p £ 0.0001) of cattle were statistically significant for seropositivity to Brucella spp. The study found that brucellosis was endemic at a low prevalence among slaughtered cattle in Nigeria, with sex and breed of cattle being significant risk factors. Considering the public health implications of brucellosis, we advocate coordinated surveillance for the disease among diverse cattle populations in Nigeria, as is carried out in most developed countries.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrucella abortusBrucellosis, BovineCattleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleMaleNigeriaPrevalenceRisk FactorsRose BengalSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, BacterialRose BengalBovine brucellosisEpidemiologyNigeria.Public HealthRBT

Identifiers

PMID27247065
PMCPMC6238672
OpenAlexW2385732999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.