Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27246774›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Discovery and Analysis of Natural-Product Compounds Inhibiting Protein Synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Yanmei Hu, Megan Keniry, Stephanie O Palmer, James M Bullard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biomolecular NMR assignments · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Solution structure of protein synthesis initiation factor 1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanmei HuChemistry Department, The University of Texas-RGV, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Megan KeniryBiology Department, The University of Texas-RGV, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Stephanie O PalmerChemistry Department, The University of Texas-RGV, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
James M BullardChemistry Department, The University of Texas-RGV, Edinburg, Texas, USA james.bullard@utrgv.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-3717
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · US

Funding

Construction of a Protein Synthesis System from Pseudomonas aeruginosa for Screening for Antibacterial CandidatesSC3GM098173 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI BULLARD, JAMES M · 2012 to 2019
$861k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM098173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial protein synthesis is the target for numerous natural and synthetic antibacterial agents. We have developed a poly(U) mRNA-directed aminoacylation/translation (A/T) protein synthesis system composed of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases (PheRS), ribosomes, and ribosomal factors from Pseudomonas aeruginosa This system has been used for high-throughput screening of a natural-compound library. Assays were developed for each component of the system to ascertain the specific target of inhibitory compounds. In high-throughput screens, 13 compounds were identified that inhibit protein synthesis with 50% inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.3 to >80 μM. MICs were determined for the compounds against the growth of a panel of pathogenic organisms, including Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae Three of the compounds were observed to have broad-spectrum activity and inhibited a hypersensitive strain of P. aeruginosa with MICs of 8 to 16 μg/ml. The molecular target of each of the three compounds was determined to be PheRS. One compound was found to be bacteriostatic, and one compound was bactericidal against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. The third compound was observed to be bacteriostatic against Gram-positive and bactericidal against Gram-negative bacteria. All three compounds were competitive with the substrate ATP; however, one compound was competitive, one was uncompetitive, and one noncompetitive with the amino acid substrate. Macromolecular synthesis assays confirm the compounds inhibit protein synthesis. The compounds were shown to be more than 25,000-fold less active than the control staurosporine in cytotoxicity MTT testing in human cell lines.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBiological ProductsCell LineGram-Positive BacteriaHEK293 CellsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Protein BiosynthesisPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRibosomesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID27246774
PMCPMC4958146
OpenAlexW2416433065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.