Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27246752›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016

Decoy Receptor 3 (DcR3) as a Biomarker of Tumor Deterioration in Female Reproductive Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Mengtong Jiang, Xiaomiao Lin, Rongquan He, Xinggu Lin, Lu Liang, Ruixue Tang, Dandan Xiong, Kanglai Wei, Yiwu Dang, Zhenbo Feng and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mengtong JiangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Xiaomiao LinDepartment of Children Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Rongquan HeCenter of Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Xinggu LinCenter of Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Lu LiangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Ruixue TangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Dandan XiongDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Kanglai WeiDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Yiwu DangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Zhenbo FengDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND DcR3 (decoy receptor 3) has been proposed be involved in development and prognosis of female reproductive cancers, including cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore the evidence for the correlation between DcR3 and the clinicopathological characteristics, as well as the overall survival time, in female reproductive cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Relevant studies were searched for in PubMed, Wiley Online Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Ovid, LILACS, Chinese CNKI, Chong Qing VIP, Wan Fang, and China Biology Medicine disc up to 30 September 2015. Data on the relationship between DcR3 expression and TNM stage, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, age, and overall survival time were extracted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs (confidence intervals) were estimated by forest plot. RESULTS Twelve studies with 1127 patients met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. Overexpression of DcR3 was significantly related to the risk of female reproductive cancers (OR=10.69, 95% CI: 6.33-18.05), TNM stage (OR=5.51, 95% CI: 2.83-10.71), differentiation (OR=4.16, 95% CI: 2.28-7.60), lymph node metastasis (OR=5.89, 95% CI: 3.16-10.9), age (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.51-1.44), and overall survival time (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 0.58-5.83). Subgroup analyses showed that overexpression of DcR3 in cervical, ovarian, and breast cancer all had similar relationships with these clinicopathological parameters. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis suggests that overexpression of DcR3 may play vital roles in the tumorigenesis and deterioration of female reproductive cancers. However, the relationship between DcR3 expression and prognosis needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisOdds RatioOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Member 6bUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Member 6bTNFRSF6B protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27246752
PMCPMC4917315
OpenAlexW2416377616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.