ArticleEuropean radiology2017
High-resolution T
Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cervical cancer in the modern era: cutting-edge strategies for diagnosis and treatment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Attenuating effect of Prosopis cineraria against paraquat-induced toxicity in prepubertal mice, Mus musculus.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Neuroimmune crosstalk and evolving pharmacotherapies in neurodegenerative diseases.Immunology · 2021Review
- Performances of Whole Tumor Texture Analysis Based on MRI: Predicting Preoperative T Stage of Rectal Carcinomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Musculoskeletal MRI at 7 T: do we need more or is it more than enough?European radiology experimental · 2020Review
- Evolution of UHF Body Imaging in the Human Torso at 7T: Technology, Applications, and Future Directions.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2019Review
- Proton MRS of cervical cancer at 7 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe studied the feasibility of high-resolution T
methodsA feasibility study on 20 stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer patients was conducted. All underwent pre-treatment 1.5-T MRI. At 7.0-T MRI, an external transmit/receive array with seven dipole antennae and a single endorectal monopole receive antenna were used. Discomfort levels were assessed. Following individualised phase-based B
resultsPatients had stage IB1 (n = 9), IB2 (n = 4), IIA1 (n = 1) or IIB (n = 6) cervical cancer. Discomfort (ten-point scale) was minimal at placement and removal of the endorectal antenna with a median score of 1 (range, 0-5) and 0 (range, 0-2) respectively. Its use did not result in adverse events or pre-term session discontinuation. To demonstrate feasibility, T
conclusionsHigh-resolution T KEY POINTS: • High resolution T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.