Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27246712›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2016

Development-on-chip: in vitro neural tube patterning with a microfluidic device.

Christopher J Demers, Prabakaran Soundararajan, Phaneendra Chennampally, Gregory A Cox, James Briscoe, Scott D Collins, Rosemary L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher J DemersMicroinstruments and Systems Laboratory, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA The Francis Crick Institute, Mill Hill Laboratory, London NW7 1AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1470-1364
Prabakaran SoundararajanMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Phaneendra ChennampallyMicroinstruments and Systems Laboratory, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA.
Gregory A CoxGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
James BriscoeThe Francis Crick Institute, Mill Hill Laboratory, London NW7 1AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1020-5240
Scott D CollinsMicroinstruments and Systems Laboratory, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA scott.collins@maine.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-5109
Rosemary L SmithMicroinstruments and Systems Laboratory, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8483-6777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryogenesis is a highly regulated process in which the precise spatial and temporal release of soluble cues directs differentiation of multipotent stem cells into discrete populations of specialized adult cell types. In the spinal cord, neural progenitor cells are directed to differentiate into adult neurons through the action of mediators released from nearby organizing centers, such as the floor plate and paraxial mesoderm. These signals combine to create spatiotemporal diffusional landscapes that precisely regulate the development of the central nervous system (CNS). Currently, in vivo and ex vivo studies of these signaling factors present some inherent ambiguity. In vitro methods are preferred for their enhanced experimental clarity but often lack the technical sophistication required for biological realism. In this article, we present a versatile microfluidic platform capable of mimicking the spatial and temporal chemical environments found in vivo during neural tube development. Simultaneous opposing and/or orthogonal gradients of developmental morphogens can be maintained, resulting in neural tube patterning analogous to that observed in vivo.

Indexed as

Body PatterningLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsCell DifferentiationComputer SimulationEquipment DesignMice, TransgenicMotor NeuronsNeural TubeTime FactorsTime-Lapse ImagingTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsDifferentiationMicrofluidicMouseNeuronPatterningStem cell

Identifiers

PMID27246712
PMCPMC4920155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.