Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245821›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Genomic Clustering of differential DNA methylated regions (epimutations) associated with the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease and phenotypic variation.

M Muksitul Haque, Eric E Nilsson, Lawrence B Holder, Michael K Skinner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review: Ewing Sarcoma Predisposition.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Transgenerational effects of obesogens.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Environmental Obesogens: Mechanisms and Controversies.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Muksitul HaqueCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Eric E NilssonCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA.
Lawrence B HolderSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Michael K SkinnerCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4236, USA. skinner@wsu.edu.
Washington State University · US

Funding

EPIGENETIC TRANSGENERATIONAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR ACTIONSR01ES012974 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SKINNER, MICHAEL K · 2005 to 2018
$4.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA variety of environmental factors have been shown to promote the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease and phenotypic variation in numerous species. Exposure to environmental factors such as toxicants can promote epigenetic changes (epimutations) involving alterations in DNA methylation to produce specific differential DNA methylation regions (DMRs). The germline (e.g. sperm) transmission of epimutations is associated with epigenetic transgenerational inheritance phenomena. The current study was designed to determine the genomic locations of environmentally induced transgenerational DMRs and assess their potential clustering.

resultsThe exposure specific DMRs (epimutations) from a number of different studies were used. The clustering approach identified areas of the genome that have statistically significant over represented numbers of epimutations. The location of DMR clusters was compared to the gene clusters of differentially expressed genes found in tissues and cells associated with the transgenerational inheritance of disease. Such gene clusters, termed epigenetic control regions (ECRs), have been previously suggested to regulate gene expression in regions spanning up to 2-5 million bases. DMR clusters were often found to associate with inherent gene clusters within the genome.

conclusionThe current study used a number of epigenetic datasets from previous studies to identify novel DMR clusters across the genome. Observations suggest these clustered DMR within an ECR may be susceptible to epigenetic reprogramming and dramatically influence genome activity.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsPhenotypeChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticEnvironmentFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansMaleMutationOrgan SpecificityComputational BiologyControl RegionDMREpigeneticsReviewTransgenerational

Identifiers

PMID27245821
PMCPMC4888261
OpenAlexW2419381940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.