Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245818›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2016

High dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy for primary and recurrent esophageal cancer : Experience from a large single-center cohort.

Nils H Nicolay, Johanna Rademacher, Jan Oelmann-Avendano, Jürgen Debus, Peter E Huber, Katja Lindel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. EUS-guided fiducial placement for intramural GI neoplasia: a facilitated technique.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nils H NicolayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. n.nicolay@dkfz.de.
Johanna RademacherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan Oelmann-AvendanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter E HuberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja LindelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this work was to evaluate outcomes and toxicities of high dose-rate (HDR) endoluminal brachytherapy in a cohort of esophageal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed the records of 36 patients treated with HDR brachytherapy for histologically confirmed esophageal cancer. Brachytherapy was either applied as a boost treatment for definitive treatment regimens or as salvage therapy for recurrent tumors with single doses between 4 and 6 Gy. Survival and toxicities were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsBrachytherapy was performed as initially planned in all but one patient; 18 patients had a complete endoscopic response at the first follow-up examination. Locoregional recurrence was observed in 24 patients after a median time of 3 months; 1‑ and 2‑year recurrence-free survival rates were 51  and 51 % for the patients treated for primary tumors and 11 and 6 % for patients treated for tumor recurrence, respectively. Median overall survival was 18 months; estimated overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 63, 50, and 30 % after primary brachytherapy, and 60, 25, and 6 % after recurrence therapy. Adenocarcinoma histology, non-complete remission after treatment, and treatment for recurrent cancers were associated with significantly reduced prognoses. Mild dysphagia was the most common side effect in 17 patients; 8 patients suffered from locoregional grade 3 toxicities, and no grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed.

conclusionsEndoluminal brachytherapy during the course of esophageal cancer treatment can be safely applied and results in good functional outcomes regarding dysphagia with low rates of severe toxicities.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAdverse effectsDysphagiaNeoplasm recurrence, localSurvival outcomeToxicity

Identifiers

PMID27245818
OpenAlexW2483583006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.