Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245282›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

Translational and clinical implications of the genetic landscape of prostate cancer.

Daniel E Spratt, Zachary S Zumsteg, Felix Y Feng, Scott A Tomlins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review of imaging techniques for evaluating morphological and functional responses to the treatment of bone metastases in prostate and breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel E Spratt *Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Zachary S Zumsteg *Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, West Hollywood, CA 90048, USA.
Felix Y FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Scott A TomlinsDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

Funding

Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Timothy Dess · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
Exploiting drivers of androgen receptor signaling negative prostate cancer for prR01CA183857 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TOMLINS, SCOTT A · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several years, analyses of data from high-throughput studies have elucidated many fundamental insights into prostate cancer biology. These insights include the identification of molecular alterations and subtypes that drive tumour progression, recurrent aberrations in signalling pathways, the existence of substantial intertumoural and intratumoural heterogeneity, Darwinian evolution in response to therapeutic pressures and the complicated multidirectional patterns of spread between primary tumours and metastatic sites. However, these concepts have not yet been fully translated into clinical tools to improve prognostication, prediction and personalization of treatment of patients with prostate cancer. The current and future clinical implications of 'omics' level knowledge is not only revolutionizing our understanding of prostate cancer biology, but is also shaping ongoing, and future clinical investigations and practice. In this Review, we summarize these advances, and the remaining challenges surrounding tumour heterogeneity and the ability to overcome treatment resistance are also described.

Indexed as

AndrogensCell CycleCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionDNA DamageDNA RepairDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression ProfilingGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemNeuroendocrine TumorsAndrogensIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseReceptors, AndrogenTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27245282
PMCPMC5030163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.