Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245279›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

Clinical development of new drug-radiotherapy combinations.

Ricky A Sharma, Ruth Plummer, Julie K Stock, Tessa A Greenhalgh, Ozlem Ataman, Stephen Kelly, Robert Clay, Richard A Adams, Richard D Baird, Lucinda Billingham and 30 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Monitoring early response to chemoradiotherapy withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genotype-Directed Synthetic Cytotoxicity of ATR Inhibition with Radiotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The potential characteristics of the sense of coherence in cancer radiotherapy patients and its correlation with coping strategies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Ricky A SharmaUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Ruth PlummerNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julie K StockCancer Research UK, London, UK.
Tessa A GreenhalghUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ozlem AtamanEisai, Hatfield Business Park, UK.
Stephen KellyPfizer Ltd., Surrey, UK.
Robert ClayKinapse Ltd, London, UK.
Richard A AdamsCardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Richard D BairdUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lucinda BillinghamUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah R BrownUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sean BucklandPfizer Ltd., Surrey, UK.
Helen BulbeckNational Cancer Research Institute, UK.
Anthony J ChalmersUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Glen ClackAstraZeneca, Cheshire, UK.
Aaron N CranstonMISSION Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Lars DamstrupMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Roberta FerraldeschiAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, UK.
Martin D ForsterUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Julian GolecVertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Ltd, Abingdon, UK.
Russell M HaganBTG International Ltd, London, UK.
Emma HallThe Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Axel-R HanauskeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Kevin J HarringtonThe Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Tom HaswellNational Cancer Research Institute, UK.
Maria A HawkinsUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tim IllidgeUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hazel JonesCancer Research UK, London, UK.
Andrew S KennedySarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Fiona McDonaldThe Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Thorsten MelcherJ&J Innovation, Menlo Park, California, USA.
James P B O'ConnorUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John R PollardVertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Ltd, Abingdon, UK.
Mark P SaundersUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David Sebag-MontefioreUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Melanie SmittGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
John StaffurthCardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Ian J StratfordUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stephen R WedgeNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
NCRI CTRad Academia-Pharma Joint Working Group

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15954Cancer Research UK 15955Cancer Research UK 15958Cancer Research UK 16397Cancer Research UK 16411Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 17870Cancer Research UK 18294Cancer Research UK 21993Cancer Research UK 8971Medical Research Council G0500366Medical Research Council G0802755Medical Research Council MC_PC_12001/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In countries with the best cancer outcomes, approximately 60% of patients receive radiotherapy as part of their treatment, which is one of the most cost-effective cancer treatments. Notably, around 40% of cancer cures include the use of radiotherapy, either as a single modality or combined with other treatments. Radiotherapy can provide enormous benefit to patients with cancer. In the past decade, significant technical advances, such as image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and proton therapy enable higher doses of radiotherapy to be delivered to the tumour with significantly lower doses to normal surrounding tissues. However, apart from the combination of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy with radiotherapy, little progress has been made in identifying and defining optimal targeted therapy and radiotherapy combinations to improve the efficacy of cancer treatment. The National Cancer Research Institute Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group (CTRad) formed a Joint Working Group with representatives from academia, industry, patient groups and regulatory bodies to address this lack of progress and to publish recommendations for future clinical research. Herein, we highlight the Working Group's consensus recommendations to increase the number of novel drugs being successfully registered in combination with radiotherapy to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell HypoxiaClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDrug ApprovalHumansNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareRadiation DosageRadiation ToleranceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.