Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245222›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2016

ODMedit: uniform semantic annotation for data integration in medicine based on a public metadata repository.

Martin Dugas, Alexandra Meidt, Philipp Neuhaus, Michael Storck, Julian Varghese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin DugasInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 | A11, D-48149, Münster, Germany. dugas@uni-muenster.de.
Alexandra MeidtInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 | A11, D-48149, Münster, Germany.
Philipp NeuhausInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 | A11, D-48149, Münster, Germany.
Michael StorckInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 | A11, D-48149, Münster, Germany.
Julian VargheseInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 | A11, D-48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe volume and complexity of patient data - especially in personalised medicine - is steadily increasing, both regarding clinical data and genomic profiles: Typically more than 1,000 items (e.g., laboratory values, vital signs, diagnostic tests etc.) are collected per patient in clinical trials. In oncology hundreds of mutations can potentially be detected for each patient by genomic profiling. Therefore data integration from multiple sources constitutes a key challenge for medical research and healthcare.

methodsSemantic annotation of data elements can facilitate to identify matching data elements in different sources and thereby supports data integration. Millions of different annotations are required due to the semantic richness of patient data. These annotations should be uniform, i.e., two matching data elements shall contain the same annotations. However, large terminologies like SNOMED CT or UMLS don't provide uniform coding. It is proposed to develop semantic annotations of medical data elements based on a large-scale public metadata repository. To achieve uniform codes, semantic annotations shall be re-used if a matching data element is available in the metadata repository.

resultsA web-based tool called ODMedit ( https://odmeditor.uni-muenster.de/ ) was developed to create data models with uniform semantic annotations. It contains ~800,000 terms with semantic annotations which were derived from ~5,800 models from the portal of medical data models (MDM). The tool was successfully applied to manually annotate 22 forms with 292 data items from CDISC and to update 1,495 data models of the MDM portal.

conclusionUniform manual semantic annotation of data models is feasible in principle, but requires a large-scale collaborative effort due to the semantic richness of patient data. A web-based tool for these annotations is available, which is linked to a public metadata repository.

Indexed as

MetadataSoftwareData CurationDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsHumansReference StandardsSemanticsData integrationODMPersonalised medicineSemantic annotation

Identifiers

PMID27245222
PMCPMC4888420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.