Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Differences in DNA Repair Capacity, Cell Death and Transcriptional Response after Irradiation between a Radiosensitive and a Radioresistant Cell Line.

Mireia Borràs-Fresneda, Joan-Francesc Barquinero, Maria Gomolka, Sabine Hornhardt, Ute Rössler, Gemma Armengol, Leonardo Barrios

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Coevolution of longevity and female germline maintenance.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mireia Borràs-FresnedaDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Joan-Francesc BarquineroDepartament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia, Unitat d'Antropologia Biològica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Maria GomolkaDepartment Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sabine HornhardtDepartment Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
Ute RösslerDepartment Radiation Protection and Health, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg, Germany.
Gemma ArmengolDepartament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia, Unitat d'Antropologia Biològica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Leonardo BarriosDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESFederal Office for Radiation Protection · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normal tissue toxicity after radiotherapy shows variability between patients, indicating inter-individual differences in radiosensitivity. Genetic variation probably contributes to these differences. The aim of the present study was to determine if two cell lines, one radiosensitive (RS) and another radioresistant (RR), showed differences in DNA repair capacity, cell viability, cell cycle progression and, in turn, if this response could be characterised by a differential gene expression profile at different post-irradiation times. After irradiation, the RS cell line showed a slower rate of γ-H2AX foci disappearance, a higher frequency of incomplete chromosomal aberrations, a reduced cell viability and a longer disturbance of the cell cycle when compared to the RR cell line. Moreover, a greater and prolonged transcriptional response after irradiation was induced in the RS cell line. Functional analysis showed that 24 h after irradiation genes involved in "DNA damage response", "direct p53 effectors" and apoptosis were still differentially up-regulated in the RS cell line but not in the RR cell line. The two cell lines showed different response to IR and can be distinguished with cell-based assays and differential gene expression analysis. The results emphasise the importance to identify biomarkers of radiosensitivity for tailoring individualized radiotherapy protocols.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalB-LymphocytesCell CycleCell DeathCell Line, TransformedCell SurvivalDNA DamageDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGamma RaysGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHistonesHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationRadiation ToleranceH2AX protein, humanHistonesTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID27245205
PMCPMC4887990
OpenAlexW2415398623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.