Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27245155›Full record

ArticleTrials2016

The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty.

Nina Hallowell, Claire Snowdon, Susan Morrow, Jane E Norman, Fiona C Denison, Julia Lawton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nina HallowellEthox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. Nina.Hallowell@ethox.ox.ac.uk.
Claire SnowdonDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Susan MorrowCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jane E NormanMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Fiona C DenisonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julia LawtonCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBWellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/29/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHope has therapeutic value because it enables people to cope with uncertainty about their future health. Indeed, hope, or therapeutic optimism (TO), is seen as an essential aspect of the provision and experience of medical care. The role of TO in clinical research has been briefly discussed, but the concept, and whether it can be transferred from care to research and from patients to clinicians, has not been fully investigated. The role played by TO in research emerged during interviews with staff involved in a peripartum trial. This paper unpacks the concept of TO in this setting and considers the role it may play in the wider delivery of clinical trials.

methodsThe Got-it trial is a UK-based, randomised placebo-controlled trial that investigates the use of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) spray to treat retained placenta. Qualitative data were collected in open-ended interviews with obstetricians, research and clinical midwives (n =27) involved in trial recruitment. Data were analysed using the method of constant comparison.

resultsTO influenced staff engagement with Got-it at different points in the trial and in different ways. Prior knowledge of, and familiarity with, GTN meant that from the outset staff perceived the trial as low risk. TO facilitated staff involvement in the trial; staff who already understood GTN's effects were optimistic that it would work, and staff collaborated because they hoped that the trial would address what they identified as an important clinical need. TO could fluctuate over the course of the trial, and was sustained or undermined by unofficial observation of clinical outcomes and speculations about treatment allocation. Thus, TO appeared to be influenced by key situational factors: prior knowledge and experience, clinical need and observed participant outcomes.

conclusionsSituational TO plays a role in facilitating staff engagement with clinical research. TO may affect trial recruitment by enabling staff to sustain the levels of uncertainty, or individual equipoise, necessary to collaborate with research while also responding to patients' clinical needs. Staff may benefit from training to deal with fluctuations in TO.

trial registrationISCRTN88609453 . Registered on 26 March 2014.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFemaleHumansPeripartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchResearch DesignUncertaintyHopeIndividual equipoiseQualitative interviewsTherapeutic optimismTrial recruitmentUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27245155
PMCPMC4888535
OpenAlexW2411945945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.