Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27244795›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2016

Risk of Suicidal Events With Atomoxetine Compared to Stimulant Treatment: A Cohort Study.

Stephan Linden, Regina Bussing, Paul Kubilis, Tobias Gerhard, Richard Segal, Jonathan J Shuster, Almut G Winterstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephan LindenPharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, slinden@ufl.edu.
Regina BussingDepartments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions.
Paul KubilisPharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy.
Tobias GerhardErnest Mario School of Pharmacy and Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Richard SegalPharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy.
Jonathan J ShusterHealth Outcomes and Policy, UF Clinical Research Center, College of Medicine, and.
Almut G WintersteinPharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; and.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USNew York College of Health Professions · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntidepressant effects on increased suicidality in children have raised public concern in recent years. Approved in 2002 for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment, the selective noradrenalin-reuptake-inhibitor atomoxetine was initially investigated for the treatment of depression. In post-hoc analyses of clinical trial data, atomoxetine has been associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation in children and adolescents. We analyzed whether the observed increased risk of suicidal ideation in clinical trials translates into an increased risk of suicidal events in pediatric patients treated with atomoxetine compared with stimulants in 26 Medicaid programs.

methodsEmploying a retrospective cohort design, we used propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the risk of suicide and suicide attempt in pediatric patients initiating treatment with atomoxetine compared with stimulants from 2002 to 2006.

resultsThe first-line treatment cohort included 279 315 patients. During the first year of follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratio for current atomoxetine use compared with current stimulant use was 0.95 (95% CI 0.47-1.92, P = .88). The second-line treatment cohort included 220 215 patients. During the first year of follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratio for current atomoxetine use compared with current stimulant use was 0.71 (95% CI 0.30-1.67, P = .43).

conclusionsFirst- and second-line treatment of youths age 5 to 18 with atomoxetine compared with stimulants was not significantly associated with an increased risk of suicidal events. The low incidence of suicide and suicide attempt resulted in wide confidence intervals and did not allow stratified analysis of high-risk groups or assessment of suicidal risk associated with long-term use of atomoxetine.

Indexed as

SuicideAdolescentAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildChild, PreschoolHumansPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSuicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID27244795
PMCPMC4845870
OpenAlexW2344179231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.