Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27244235›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2016

Ibogaine and addiction in the animal model, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

M Belgers, M Leenaars, J R Homberg, M Ritskes-Hoitinga, A F A Schellekens, C R Hooijmans

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Ibogaine for Substance Use Disorders.Advances in therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. About Sugar Addiction.Brain and behavior · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of opioid abuse and pain.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M BelgersIrisZorg, Department of Addiction Health Care, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
M LeenaarsDepartments of SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Central Animal Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J R HombergBehavioural Neurogenetics group at the Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M Ritskes-HoitingaDepartments of SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Central Animal Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A F A SchellekensDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C R HooijmansDepartments of SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Central Animal Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLNijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ibogaine is a naturally occurring substance which has been increasingly used in the lay-scene to reduce craving and relapse in patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). Although human clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of ibogaine are lacking, animal studies do support the efficacy of ibogaine. In this systematic review and meta-analysis (MA), we summarise these animal findings, addressing three questions: (1) does ibogaine reduce addictive behaviour in animal models of SUDs?; (2) what are the toxic effects of ibogaine on motor functioning, cerebellum and heart rhythm?; (3) what are neuropharmacological working mechanisms of ibogaine treatment in animal models of SUDs? MA of 27 studies showed that ibogaine reduced drug self-administration, particularly during the first 24 h after administration. Ibogaine had no effect on drug-induced conditioned place preference. Ibogaine administration resulted in motor impairment in the first 24 h after supplementation, and cerebral cell loss even weeks after administration. Data on ibogaines effect on cardiac rhythm, as well as on its neuropharmacological working mechanisms are limited. Our results warrant further studies into the clinical efficacy of ibogaine in SUD patients in reducing craving and substance use, but close monitoring of the patients is recommended because of the possible toxic effects. In addition, more work is needed to unravel the neuropharmacological working mechanisms of ibogaine and to investigate its effects on heart rhythm.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalIllicit DrugsAnimalsCerebellumDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleIbogaineMaleMotor ActivityNeuronsSelf AdministrationSubstance-Related DisordersIbogaineIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID27244235
PMCPMC5545647
OpenAlexW2412319325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.