Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27243222›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Do Farmers Using Conventional and Non-Conventional Systems of Agriculture Have Different Perceptions of the Diversity of Wild Birds? Implications for Conservation.

Horasa Lima Silva-Andrade, Luciano Pires de Andrade, Lauana Souza Muniz, Wallace Rodrigues Telino-Júnior, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Rachel Maria Lyra-Neves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Horasa Lima Silva-AndradeDepartment of Biology, Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation - PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5366-6610
Luciano Pires de AndradeDepartment of Biology, Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation - PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Lauana Souza MunizGraduate Program in Management of Sustainable Local Development, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Wallace Rodrigues Telino-JúniorDepartment of Biology, Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation - PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Ulysses Paulino AlbuquerqueDepartment of Biology, Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation - PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rachel Maria Lyra-NevesDepartment of Biology, Graduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation - PPGEtno, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmers' perceptions of birds' interactions with agricultural production systems are fundamental to species conservation efforts. In the present study, we evaluated the perceptions of birds held by farmers who engage in conventional and non-conventional agricultural production processes and the implications of potential differences in these perceptions on species conservation. To accomplish this, data were collected using questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and other complementary sources of information gathered from 191 farmers in northeastern Brazil. Although some similarities were identified among the farmers in their perceptions and local ecological knowledge (LEK) of birds, differences existed between the conventional and non-conventional farmers in their attitudes toward, conflicts with, and usage of bird species. Compared to the conventional farmers, the non-conventional farmers could identify more bird species, possessed more favorable attitudes toward birds, and engaged in practices more beneficial to the conservation of avifauna. The perceptions that were identified were related to the type of agriculture practiced, and such perceptions may affect the conservation of bird species. Therefore, the adoption of certain agricultural practices has important implications for conservation. Our results indicate the need for investment in public policies, programs and actions that account for farmers' knowledge and perceptions. Such investments will contribute to the development and adoption of practices supporting wild bird conservation in agricultural areas.

Indexed as

AgricultureBirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAnimals, WildAttitudeBrazilEcosystemFarmersHumansPerceptionSpecies SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27243222
PMCPMC4887029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.