Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242969›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2016

Identification of Secreted Exoproteome Fingerprints of Highly-Virulent and Non-Virulent Staphylococcus aureus Strains.

Emilia Bonar, Iwona Wojcik, Urszula Jankowska, Sylwia Kedracka-Krok, Michal Bukowski, Klaudia Polakowska, Marcin W Lis, Maja Kosecka-Strojek, Artur J Sabat, Grzegorz Dubin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Secretome Profiling ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Secreted Toxins FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emilia BonarDepartment of Analytical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Iwona WojcikDepartment of Analytical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Urszula JankowskaMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Sylwia Kedracka-KrokMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland; Department of Physical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland.
Michal BukowskiDepartment of Analytical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Klaudia PolakowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Marcin W LisDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Reproduction and Welfare, Faculty of Animal Welfare, University of Agriculture in Krakow Krakow, Poland.
Maja Kosecka-StrojekDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Artur J SabatDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Grzegorz DubinMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland.
Alexander W FriedrichDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Jacek MiedzobrodzkiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Adam DubinDepartment of Analytical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.
Benedykt WladykaDepartment of Analytical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal inhabitant of skin and mucous membranes in nose vestibule but also an important opportunistic pathogen of humans and livestock. The extracellular proteome as a whole constitutes its major virulence determinant; however, the involvement of particular proteins is still relatively poorly understood. In this study, we compared the extracellular proteomes of poultry-derived S. aureus strains exhibiting a virulent (VIR) and non-virulent (NVIR) phenotype in a chicken embryo experimental infection model with the aim to identify proteomic signatures associated with the particular phenotypes. Despite significant heterogeneity within the analyzed proteomes, we identified alpha-haemolysin and bifunctional autolysin as indicators of virulence, whereas glutamylendopeptidase production was characteristic for non-virulent strains. Staphopain C (StpC) was identified in both the VIR and NVIR proteomes and the latter fact contradicted previous findings suggesting its involvement in virulence. By supplementing NVIR, StpC-negative strains with StpC, and comparing the virulence of parental and supplemented strains, we demonstrated that staphopain C alone does not affect staphylococcal virulence in a chicken embryo model.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsChick EmbryoDisease Models, AnimalProteomeStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusVirulence FactorsBacterial ProteinsProteomeVirulence Factorschicken embryo modelpathogenproteinproteomicsStaphylococcusvirulence

Identifiers

PMID27242969
PMCPMC4874363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.