Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2016

Single Molecule Analysis of Laser Localized Interstrand Crosslinks.

Jing Huang, Himabindu Gali, Manikandan Paramasivam, Parameswary Muniandy, Julia Gichimu, Marina A Bellani, Michael M Seidman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Single Molecule Analysis of Laser Localized Psoralen Adducts.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing HuangLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Himabindu GaliLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Manikandan ParamasivamLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Parameswary MuniandyLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Julia GichimuLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marina A BellaniLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael M SeidmanLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Repair of localized DNA damageZIAAG000746 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SEIDMAN, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
The Fanconi Anemia Pathway in Inflammatory Senescent CellsZIAAG000780 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SEIDMAN, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$672k
Repair of localized DNA damageZ01AG000746 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SEIDMAN, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2008
$607k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) block unwinding of the double helix, and have always been regarded as major challenges to replication and transcription. Compounds that form these lesions are very toxic and are frequently used in cancer chemotherapy. We have developed two strategies, both based on immunofluorescence (IF), for studying cellular responses to ICLs. The basis of each is psoralen, a photoactive (by long wave ultraviolet light, UVA) DNA crosslinking agent, to which we have linked an antigen tag. In the one approach, we have taken advantage of DNA fiber and immuno-quantum dot technologies for visualizing the encounter of replication forks with ICLs induced by exposure to UVA lamps. In the other, psoralen ICLs are introduced into nuclei in live cells in regions of interest defined by a UVA laser. The antigen tag can be displayed by conventional IF, as can the recruitment and accumulation of DNA damage response proteins to the laser localized ICLs. However, substantial difference between the technologies creates considerable uncertainty as to whether conclusions from one approach are applicable to those of the other. In this report, we have employed the fiber/quantum dot methodology to determine lesion density and spacing on individual DNA molecules carrying laser localized ICLs. We have performed the same measurements on DNA fibers with ICLs induced by exposure of psoralen to UVA lamps. Remarkably, we find little difference in the adduct distribution on fibers prepared from cells exposed to the different treatment protocols. Furthermore, there is considerable similarity in patterns of replication in the vicinity of the ICLs introduced by the two techniques.

Indexed as

DNA damageDNA fiberinterstrand crosslinkslaserreplicationsingle molecule

Identifiers

PMID27242893
PMCPMC4860505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.