Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242829›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Analysis of Cryptic, Systemic Botrytis Infections in Symptomless Hosts.

Michael W Shaw, Christy J Emmanuel, Deni Emilda, Razak B Terhem, Aminath Shafia, Dimitra Tsamaidi, Mark Emblow, Jan A L van Kan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association of SOPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple and multidrug resistance inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  6. Antifungal Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Mechanisms of Action of Microbial Biocontrol Agents againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Grand Challenges in Fungi-Plant Interactions.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Priming of Defense Systems and Upregulation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. The Plant cell · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Dual Transcriptome and Metabolic Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael W ShawSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Reading, UK.
Christy J EmmanuelSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Reading, UK.
Deni EmildaLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Razak B TerhemLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Aminath ShafiaSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Reading, UK.
Dimitra TsamaidiSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Reading, UK.
Mark EmblowSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights Reading, UK.
Jan A L van KanLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botrytis species are generally considered to be aggressive, necrotrophic plant pathogens. By contrast to this general perception, however, Botrytis species could frequently be isolated from the interior of multiple tissues in apparently healthy hosts of many species. Infection frequencies reached 50% of samples or more, but were commonly less, and cryptic infections were rare or absent in some plant species. Prevalence varied substantially from year to year and from tissue to tissue, but some host species routinely had high prevalence. The same genotype was found to occur throughout a host, representing mycelial spread. Botrytis cinerea and Botrytis pseudocinerea are the species that most commonly occur as cryptic infections, but phylogenetically distant isolates of Botrytis were also detected, one of which does not correspond to previously described species. Sporulation and visible damage occurred only when infected tissues were stressed, or became mature or senescent. There was no evidence of cryptic infection having a deleterious effect on growth of the host, and prevalence was probably greater in plants grown in high light conditions. Isolates from cryptic infections were often capable of causing disease (to varying extents) when spore suspensions were inoculated onto their own host as well as on distinct host species, arguing against co-adaptation between cryptic isolates and their hosts. These data collectively suggest that several Botrytis species, including the most notorious pathogenic species, exist frequently in cryptic form to an extent that has thus far largely been neglected, and do not need to cause disease on healthy hosts in order to complete their life-cycles.

Indexed as

Botrytisgray moldsystemic infectionwild vegetation

Identifiers

PMID27242829
PMCPMC4861902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.