Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242774›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

A Rapid Molecular Test for Determining Yersinia pestis Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin by the Quantification of Differentially Expressed Marker Genes.

Ida Steinberger-Levy, Ohad Shifman, Anat Zvi, Naomi Ariel, Adi Beth-Din, Ofir Israeli, David Gur, Moshe Aftalion, Sharon Maoz, Raphael Ber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of In Vitro Efficiency of Ciclopirox AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Characterization ofViruses · 2021
    Article
  15. Screening of an FDA-Approved Library for Novel Drugs againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ida Steinberger-LevyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Ohad ShifmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Anat ZviDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Naomi ArielDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Adi Beth-DinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Ofir IsraeliDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
David GurDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Moshe AftalionDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Sharon MaozDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Raphael BerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard antimicrobial susceptibility tests used to determine bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics are growth dependent and time consuming. The long incubation time required for standard tests may render susceptibility results irrelevant, particularly for patients infected with lethal bacteria that are slow growing on agar but progress rapidly in vivo, such as Yersinia pestis. Here, we present an alternative approach for the rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility, based on the quantification of the changes in the expression levels of specific marker genes following exposure to growth-inhibiting concentrations of the antibiotic, using Y. pestis and ciprofloxacin as a model. The marker genes were identified by transcriptomic DNA microarray analysis of the virulent Y. pestis Kimberley53 strain after exposure to specific concentrations of ciprofloxacin for various time periods. We identified several marker genes that were induced following exposure to growth-inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin, and we confirmed the marker expression profiles at additional ciprofloxacin concentrations using quantitative RT-PCR. Eleven candidate marker transcripts were identified, of which four mRNA markers were selected for a rapid quantitative RT-PCR susceptibility test that correctly determined the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values and the categories of susceptibility of several Y. pestis strains and isolates harboring various ciprofloxacin MIC values. The novel molecular susceptibility test requires just 2 h of antibiotic exposure in a 7-h overall test time, in contrast to the 24 h of antibiotic exposure required for a standard microdilution test.

Indexed as

antibioticsciprofloxacinminimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)molecular testingqRT-PCRrapid ASTRNA expressionY. pestis

Identifiers

PMID27242774
PMCPMC4871873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.