Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242755›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Chicken Anti-Campylobacter Vaccine - Comparison of Various Carriers and Routes of Immunization.

Patrycja A Kobierecka, Agnieszka K Wyszyńska, Jerzy Gubernator, Maciej Kuczkowski, Oskar Wiśniewski, Marta Maruszewska, Anna Wojtania, Katarzyna E Derlatka, Iwona Adamska, Renata Godlewska and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Preharvest Control ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Two Recombinant Protein-Based Vaccine Regimens againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Systematic Review ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current and Potential Treatments for ReducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrycja A KobiereckaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka K WyszyńskaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy GubernatorDepartment of Lipids and Liposomes, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wrocław Wrocław, Poland.
Maciej KuczkowskiDepartment of Epizootiology and Clinic of Birds and Exotic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences Wrocław, Poland.
Oskar WiśniewskiDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Marta MaruszewskaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Anna WojtaniaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna E DerlatkaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Iwona AdamskaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Renata GodlewskaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
Elżbieta K Jagusztyn-KrynickaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.
University of Warsaw · PLUniversity of Wrocław · PLWroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter spp, especially the species Campylobacter jejuni, are important human enteropathogens responsible for millions of cases of gastro-intestinal disease worldwide every year. C. jejuni is a zoonotic pathogen, and poultry meat that has been contaminated by microorganisms is recognized as a key source of human infections. Although numerous strategies have been developed and experimentally checked to generate chicken vaccines, the results have so far had limited success. In this study, we explored the potential use of non-live carriers of Campylobacter antigen to combat Campylobacter in poultry. First, we assessed the effectiveness of immunization with orally or subcutaneously delivered Gram-positive Enhancer Matrix (GEM) particles carrying two Campylobacter antigens: CjaA and CjaD. These two immunization routes using GEMs as the vector did not protect against Campylobacter colonization. Thus, we next assessed the efficacy of in ovo immunization using various delivery systems: GEM particles and liposomes. The hybrid protein rCjaAD, which is CjaA presenting CjaD epitopes on its surface, was employed as a model antigen. We found that rCjaAD administered in ovo at embryonic development day 18 by both delivery systems resulted in significant levels of protection after challenge with a heterologous C. jejuni strain. In practice, in ovo chicken vaccination is used by the poultry industry to protect birds against several viral diseases. Our work showed that this means of delivery is also efficacious with respect to commensal bacteria such as Campylobacter. In this study, we evaluated the protection after one dose of vaccine given in ovo. We speculate that the level of protection may be increased by a post-hatch booster of orally delivered antigens.

Indexed as

CampylobacterGEM particlesin ovo immunizationliposomesrCjaAD

Identifiers

PMID27242755
PMCPMC4872485
OpenAlexW2394639694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.