Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Probiotic Bacillus cereus Strains, a Potential Risk for Public Health in China.

Kui Zhu, Christina S Hölzel, Yifang Cui, Ricarda Mayer, Yang Wang, Richard Dietrich, Andrea Didier, Rupert Bassitta, Erwin Märtlbauer, Shuangyang Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotic Alternatives and Next-Generation Therapeutics forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Evaluating the Safety ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. CellulolyticMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  9. Pathological changes of highly pathogenicThe veterinary quarterly · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biofilm · 2022
    Review
  13. Autoclaved Diet with Inactivated Spores ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Draft Genome Sequences of NineMicrobiology resource announcements · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Conjugation acrossFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. A virulentVirulence · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kui ZhuBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural UniversityBeijing, China; Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of MunichOberschleißheim, Germany.
Christina S HölzelDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Yifang CuiNational Center for Veterinary Drug Safety Evaluation, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Ricarda MayerDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Yang WangNational Center for Veterinary Drug Safety Evaluation, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Richard DietrichDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Andrea DidierDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Rupert BassittaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Erwin MärtlbauerDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Shuangyang DingNational Center for Veterinary Drug Safety Evaluation, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEChina Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacillus cereus is an important cause of foodborne infectious disease and food poisoning. However, B. cereus has also been used as a probiotic in human medicine and livestock production, with low standards of safety assessment. In this study, we evaluated the safety of 15 commercial probiotic B. cereus preparations from China in terms of mislabeling, toxin production, and transferable antimicrobial resistance. Most preparations were incorrectly labeled, as they contained additional bacterial species; one product did not contain viable B. cereus at all. In total, 18 B. cereus group strains-specifically B. cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis-were isolated. Enterotoxin genes nhe, hbl, and cytK1, as well as the ces-gene were assessed by PCR. Enterotoxin production and cytotoxicity were confirmed by ELISA and cell culture assays, respectively. All isolated B. cereus group strains produced the enterotoxin Nhe; 15 strains additionally produced Hbl. Antimicrobial resistance was assessed by microdilution; resistance genes were detected by PCR and further characterized by sequencing, transformation and conjugation assays. Nearly half of the strains harbored the antimicrobial resistance gene tet(45). In one strain, tet(45) was situated on a mobile genetic element-encoding a site-specific recombination mechanism-and was transferable to Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis by electro-transformation. In view of the wide and uncontrolled use of these products, stricter regulations for safety assessment, including determination of virulence factors and transferable antimicrobial resistance genes, are urgently needed.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceBacillus cereusChinadif siteenterotoxinprobioticsite-specific recombinationtetracycline resistance gene tet(45)

Identifiers

PMID27242738
PMCPMC4876114
OpenAlexW2397685126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.