Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

High Primary Production Contrasts with Intense Carbon Emission in a Eutrophic Tropical Reservoir.

Rafael M Almeida, Gabriel N Nóbrega, Pedro C Junger, Aline V Figueiredo, Anízio S Andrade, Caroline G B de Moura, Denise Tonetta, Ernandes S Oliveira, Fabiana Araújo, Felipe Rust and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An assessment of COPeerJ · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatiotemporal Patterns in pCOInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Eutrophication effects on CHEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  7. COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Rafael M AlmeidaLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Gabriel N NóbregaDepartamento de Ciência do Solo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, University of São Paulo Piracicaba, Brazil.
Pedro C JungerLaboratory of Limnology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Aline V FigueiredoLaboratory of Water Resources and Environmental Sanitation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Anízio S AndradeLaboratory of Limnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Caroline G B de MouraLaboratory of Limnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Denise TonettaLaboratory of Freshwater Ecology, Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianópolis, Brazil.
Ernandes S OliveiraDepartment of Aquatic Ecology and Environmental Biology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Fabiana AraújoLaboratory of Water Resources and Environmental Sanitation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Felipe RustLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Juan M Piñeiro-GuerraDepartamento de Ecología Teórica y Aplicada, Centro Universitario Regional Este and Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República Montevideo, Uruguay.
Jurandir R MendonçaLaboratory of Water Resources and Environmental Sanitation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Leonardo R MedeirosLaboratory of Limnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Lorena PinheiroDepartamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcela MirandaLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Mariana R A CostaLaboratory of Water Resources and Environmental Sanitation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Michaela L MeloLaboratory of Microbial Processes and Biodiversity, Federal University of São Carlos São Carlos, Brazil.
Regina L G NobreLaboratory of Limnology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Thiago BenevidesLaboratory of Limnology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fábio RolandLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Jeroen de KleinAquatic Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Nathan O BarrosLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Raquel MendonçaLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Juiz de ForaJuiz de Fora, Brazil; Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala UniversityUppsala, Sweden.
Vanessa BeckerLaboratory of Water Resources and Environmental Sanitation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Vera L M HuszarLaboratório de Ficologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sarian KostenDepartment of Aquatic Ecology and Environmental Biology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies from temperate lakes indicate that eutrophic systems tend to emit less carbon dioxide (CO2) and bury more organic carbon (OC) than oligotrophic ones, rendering them CO2 sinks in some cases. However, the scarcity of data from tropical systems is critical for a complete understanding of the interplay between eutrophication and aquatic carbon (C) fluxes in warm waters. We test the hypothesis that a warm eutrophic system is a source of both CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere, and that atmospheric emissions are larger than the burial of OC in sediments. This hypothesis was based on the following assumptions: (i) OC mineralization rates are high in warm water systems, so that water column CO2 production overrides the high C uptake by primary producers, and (ii) increasing trophic status creates favorable conditions for CH4 production. We measured water-air and sediment-water CO2 fluxes, CH4 diffusion, ebullition and oxidation, net ecosystem production (NEP) and sediment OC burial during the dry season in a eutrophic reservoir in the semiarid northeastern Brazil. The reservoir was stratified during daytime and mixed during nighttime. In spite of the high rates of primary production (4858 ± 934 mg C m(-2) d(-1)), net heterotrophy was prevalent due to high ecosystem respiration (5209 ± 992 mg C m(-2) d(-1)). Consequently, the reservoir was a source of atmospheric CO2 (518 ± 182 mg C m(-2) d(-1)). In addition, the reservoir was a source of ebullitive (17 ± 10 mg C m(-2) d(-1)) and diffusive CH4 (11 ± 6 mg C m(-2) d(-1)). OC sedimentation was high (1162 mg C m(-2) d(-1)), but our results suggest that the majority of it is mineralized to CO2 (722 ± 182 mg C m(-2) d(-1)) rather than buried as OC (440 mg C m(-2) d(-1)). Although temporally resolved data would render our findings more conclusive, our results suggest that despite being a primary production and OC burial hotspot, the tropical eutrophic system studied here was a stronger CO2 and CH4 source than a C sink, mainly because of high rates of OC mineralization in the water column and sediments.

Indexed as

Caatingacarbon dioxidemethanenet ecosystem productionorganic carbon burialsemiarid

Identifiers

PMID27242737
PMCPMC4870258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.