Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Molecular Characterization and Meta-Analysis of Gut Microbial Communities Illustrate Enrichment of Prevotella and Megasphaera in Indian Subjects.

Shrikant Bhute, Pranav Pande, Sudarshan A Shetty, Rahul Shelar, Sachin Mane, Shreyas V Kumbhare, Ashwini Gawali, Hemal Makhani, Mohit Navandar, Dhiraj Dhotre and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of gut bacteriome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial diversity of traditional fermented food,Journal of food science and technology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shrikant BhuteDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India.
Pranav PandeMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Sudarshan A ShettyMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Rahul ShelarMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Sachin ManeMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Shreyas V KumbhareMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Ashwini GawaliMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Hemal MakhaniMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Mohit NavandarMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Dhiraj DhotreMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.
Himangi LubreeDiabetes Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, India.
Dhiraj AgarwalVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, India.
Rutuja PatilVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, India.
Shantanu OzarkarDepartment of Anthropology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India.
Saroj GhaskadbiDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India.
Chittaranjan YajnikDiabetes Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, India.
Sanjay JuvekarVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune, India.
Govind K MakhariaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India.
Yogesh S ShoucheMicrobial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University campus Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome has varied impact on the wellbeing of humans. It is influenced by different factors such as age, dietary habits, socio-economic status, geographic location, and genetic makeup of individuals. For devising microbiome-based therapies, it is crucial to identify population specific features of the gut microbiome. Indian population is one of the most ethnically, culturally, and geographically diverse, but the gut microbiome features remain largely unknown. The present study describes gut microbial communities of healthy Indian subjects and compares it with the microbiota from other populations. Based on large differences in alpha diversity indices, abundance of 11 bacterial phyla and individual specific OTUs, we report inter-individual variations in gut microbial communities of these subjects. While the gut microbiome of Indians is different from that of Americans, it shared high similarity to individuals from the Indian subcontinent i.e., Bangladeshi. Distinctive feature of Indian gut microbiota is the predominance of genus Prevotella and Megasphaera. Further, when compared with other non-human primates, it appears that Indians share more OTUs with omnivorous mammals. Our metagenomic imputation indicates higher potential for glycan biosynthesis and xenobiotic metabolism in these subjects. Our study indicates urgent need of identification of population specific microbiome biomarkers of Indian subpopulations to have more holistic view of the Indian gut microbiome and its health implications.

Indexed as

16S rRNA ampliconIndian subjectsPrevotella and MegasphaeraqPCR

Identifiers

PMID27242691
PMCPMC4860526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.