Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242660›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2016

Meta-analysis of Vascular Imaging Features to Predict Outcome Following Intravenous rtPA for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Ricardo C Nogueira, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Nazia P Saeed, Manoel J Teixeira, Ronney B Panerai, Thompson G Robinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review of studies on dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the acute phase of stroke and the relationship with clinical outcome.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ricardo C NogueiraDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo , Brazil.
Edson Bor-Seng-ShuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo , Brazil.
Nazia P SaeedDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester , Leicester , England.
Manoel J TeixeiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo , Brazil.
Ronney B PaneraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England; Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Science, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, England.
Thompson G RobinsonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England; Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Science, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present review investigated which findings in vascular imaging techniques can be used to predict clinical outcome and the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in patients who underwent intravenous thrombolytic treatment.

methodsPublications were searched, and the inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) published manuscripts, (2) patients with acute ischemic stroke managed with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), and (3) availability of imaging assessment to determine vessel patency or the regulation of cerebral blood flow prior to, during, and/or after thrombolytic treatment. Clinical outcomes were divided into neurological outcome [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) within 7 days] and functional outcome (modified Rankin score in 2-3 months). sICH was defined as rtPA-related intracerebral bleeding associated with any worsening of NIHSS.

resultsThirty-nine articles were selected. Recanalization was associated with improved neurological and functional outcomes (OR = 7.83; 95% CI, 3.71-16.53; p < 0.001 and OR = 11.12; 95% CI, 5.85-21.14; p < 0.001, respectively). Both tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery (ICA/MCA) occlusions and isolated ICA occlusion had worse functional outcome than isolated MCA occlusion (OR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.12-0.52; p < 0.001 and OR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.07-0.77; p = 0.016, respectively). Reocclusion was associated with neurological deterioration (OR = 6.48, 95% CI, 3.64-11.56; p < 0.001), and early recanalization was associated with lower odds of sICH (OR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.18-0.70; p = 0.003).

conclusionBrain circulation data before, during, and after thrombolysis may be useful for predicting the clinical outcome. Cerebral arterial recanalization, presence and site of occlusion, and reocclusion are all important in predicting the clinical outcome.

Indexed as

cerebral autoregulationcerebral hemodynamicsclinical outcomeintracerebral hemorrhageintracranial circulationischemic strokertPA

Identifiers

PMID27242660
PMCPMC4870283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.