Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242637›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

Reward Promotes Self-Face Processing: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Youlong Zhan, Jie Chen, Xiao Xiao, Jin Li, Zilu Yang, Wei Fan, Yiping Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Specificity in the processing of a subject's own name.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Youlong ZhanDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China.
Xiao XiaoCollege of Chengnan, Hunan First Normal University Changsha, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China.
Zilu YangDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China.
Wei FanDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China.
Yiping ZhongDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal UniversityChangsha, China.
Hunan Normal University · CNHunan First Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study adopted a reward-priming paradigm to investigate whether and how monetary reward cues affected self-face processing. Event-related potentials were recorded during judgments of head orientation of target faces (self, friend, and stranger), with performance associated with a monetary reward. The results showed self-faces elicited larger N2 mean amplitudes than other-faces, and mean N2 amplitudes increased after monetary reward as compared with no reward cue. Moreover, an interaction effect between cue type and face type was observed for the P3 component, suggesting that both self-faces and friend-faces elicited larger P3 mean amplitudes than stranger-faces after no reward cue, with no significant difference between self-faces and friend-faces under this condition. However, self-faces elicited larger P3 mean amplitudes than friend-faces when monetary reward cues were provided. Interestingly, the enhancement of reward on friend-faces processing was observed at late positive potentials (LPP; 450-600 ms), suggesting that the LPP difference between friend-faces and stranger-faces was enhanced with monetary reward cues. Thus, we found that the enhancement effect of reward on self-relevant processing occurred at the later stages, but not at the early stage. These findings suggest that the activation of the reward expectations can enhance self-face processing, yielding a robust and sustained modulation over their overlapped brain areas where reward and self-relevant processing mechanisms may operate together.

Indexed as

ERPLPPP3rewardself-face advantageself-relevant processing

Identifiers

PMID27242637
PMCPMC4871870
OpenAlexW2398790532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.