ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016
Developing Brain Vital Signs: Initial Framework for Monitoring Brain Function Changes Over Time.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurophysiology of Downhill Mountain Bike Athletes-Benchmark Assessments of Event-Related Potentials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Objective Neurophysiological Measures of Cognitive Performance in Elite Ice Hockey Players.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- The Posterior Dominant Rhythm Remains Within Normal Limits in the Microgravity Environment.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- An objective neurophysiological study of subconcussion in female and male high school student athletes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of personalized rehabilitation in adults suffering from persistent concussion symptoms as compared to usual care: a randomized control trial protocol.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Brain vital signs as a quantitative measure of cognition: Methodological implementation in a care home environment.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Brain vital sign monitoring of sleep deprivation detects situational cognitive impairment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- A retrospective, observational study of real-world clinical data from the Cognitive Function Development Therapy program.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mixed martial arts athletes demonstrate different brain vital sign profiles compared to matched controls at baseline.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Real world evidence of improved attention and cognition during physical therapy paired with neuromodulation: a brain vital signs study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Objective Neurophysiologic Markers of Cognition After Pediatric Brain Injury.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Monitoring the Impact of Spaceflight on the Human Brain.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Subconcussive changes in youth football players: objective evidence using brain vital signs and instrumented accelerometers.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Event Related Potential Signal Capture Can Be Enhanced through Dynamic SNR-Weighted Channel Pooling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Mitigating Long-Term COVID-19 Consequences on Brain Health.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Using Muse: Rapid Mobile Assessment of Brain Performance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Contextual Processing and the Impacts of Aging and Neurodegeneration: A Scoping Review.Clinical interventions in aging · 2021Article
- Subconcussive brain vital signs changes predict head-impact exposure in ice hockey players.Brain communications · 2021Article
- Brain Vital Signs in Elite Ice Hockey: Towards Characterizing Objective and Specific Neurophysiological Reference Values for Concussion Management.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Semantic Processing in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of the N400 Differences.Brain sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical assessment of brain function relies heavily on indirect behavior-based tests. Unfortunately, behavior-based assessments are subjective and therefore susceptible to several confounding factors. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs), derived from electroencephalography (EEG), are often used to provide objective, physiological measures of brain function. Historically, ERPs have been characterized extensively within research settings, with limited but growing clinical applications. Over the past 20 years, we have developed clinical ERP applications for the evaluation of functional status following serious injury and/or disease. This work has identified an important gap: the need for a clinically accessible framework to evaluate ERP measures. Crucially, this enables baseline measures before brain dysfunction occurs, and might enable the routine collection of brain function metrics in the future much like blood pressure measures today. Here, we propose such a framework for extracting specific ERPs as potential "brain vital signs." This framework enabled the translation/transformation of complex ERP data into accessible metrics of brain function for wider clinical utilization. To formalize the framework, three essential ERPs were selected as initial indicators: (1) the auditory N100 (Auditory sensation); (2) the auditory oddball P300 (Basic attention); and (3) the auditory speech processing N400 (Cognitive processing). First step validation was conducted on healthy younger and older adults (age range: 22-82 years). Results confirmed specific ERPs at the individual level (86.81-98.96%), verified predictable age-related differences (P300 latency delays in older adults, p < 0.05), and demonstrated successful linear transformation into the proposed brain vital sign (BVS) framework (basic attention latency sub-component of BVS framework reflects delays in older adults, p < 0.05). The findings represent an initial critical step in developing, extracting, and characterizing ERPs as vital signs, critical for subsequent evaluation of dysfunction in conditions like concussion and/or dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.