ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016
Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Cognitive hearing science: Investigating the relationship between selective attention and brain activity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Spatial release from informational masking enhances the early cortical representation of speech sounds.Auditory perception & cognition · 2022Article
- The cognitive hearing science perspective on perceiving, understanding, and remembering language: The ELU model.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Defining the Role of Attention in Hierarchical Auditory Processing.Audiology research · 2021Review
- The Effects of Working Memory Load on Auditory Distraction in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Visual load does not decrease the auditory steady-state response to 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tones.Psychophysiology · 2020Article
- Top-Down Inference in the Auditory System: Potential Roles for Corticofugal Projections.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2020Review
- Multisensory Integration Strategy for Modality-Specific Loss of Inhibition Control in Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Can Intrinsic and Extrinsic Metacognitive Cues Shield Against Distraction in Problem Solving?Journal of cognition · 2018Article
- Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2018Article
- Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rostral brainstem receives both "bottom-up" input from the ascending auditory system and "top-down" descending corticofugal connections. Speech information passing through the inferior colliculus of elderly listeners reflects the periodicity envelope of a speech syllable. This information arguably also reflects a composite of temporal-fine-structure (TFS) information from the higher frequency vowel harmonics of that repeated syllable. The amplitude of those higher frequency harmonics, bearing even higher frequency TFS information, correlates positively with the word recognition ability of elderly listeners under reverberatory conditions. Also relevant is that working memory capacity (WMC), which is subject to age-related decline, constrains the processing of sounds at the level of the brainstem. Turning to the effects of a visually presented sensory or memory load on auditory processes, there is a load-dependent reduction of that processing, as manifest in the auditory brainstem responses (ABR) evoked by to-be-ignored clicks. Wave V decreases in amplitude with increases in the visually presented memory load. A visually presented sensory load also produces a load-dependent reduction of a slightly different sort: The sensory load of visually presented information limits the disruptive effects of background sound upon working memory performance. A new early filter model is thus advanced whereby systems within the frontal lobe (affected by sensory or memory load) cholinergically influence top-down corticofugal connections. Those corticofugal connections constrain the processing of complex sounds such as speech at the level of the brainstem. Selective attention thereby limits the distracting effects of background sound entering the higher auditory system via the inferior colliculus. Processing TFS in the brainstem relates to perception of speech under adverse conditions. Attentional selectivity is crucial when the signal heard is degraded or masked: e.g., speech in noise, speech in reverberatory environments. The assumptions of a new early filter model are consistent with these findings: A subcortical early filter, with a predictive selectivity based on acoustical (linguistic) context and foreknowledge, is under cholinergic top-down control. A prefrontal capacity limitation constrains this top-down control as is guided by the cholinergic processing of contextual information in working memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.