Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242377›Full record

GuidelineHealth promotion international2017

Toward consensus on self-management support: the international chronic condition self-management support framework.

Susan L Mills, Teresa J Brady, Janaki Jayanthan, Shabnam Ziabakhsh, Peter M Sargious

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Health promotion international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681065 (Affective Based Integrated Care for Better Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05681065 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Affective Based Integrated Care for Better Quality of Life (TeNDER).Pilot Implementation. Site 1: Primary Care Madrid, Spain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGerencia de Atención Primaria, MadridRan2021 to 2023Enrolled534ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsTeNDER tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan L MillsSchool of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, CanadaV6T 1Z3.
Teresa J BradyU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Janaki JayanthanBC Centre of Excellence for Women's Health, Vancouver, Canada.
Shabnam ZiabakhshBC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Peter M SargiousFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-management support (SMS) initiatives have been hampered by insufficient attention to underserved and disadvantaged populations, a lack of integration between health, personal and social domains, over emphasis on individual responsibility and insufficient attention to ethical issues. This paper describes a SMS framework that provides guidance in developing comprehensive and coordinated approaches to SMS that may address these gaps and provides direction for decision makers in developing and implementing SMS initiatives in key areas at local levels. The framework was developed by researchers, policy-makers, practitioners and consumers from 5 English-speaking countries and reviewed by 203 individuals in 16 countries using an e-survey process. While developments in SMS will inevitably reflect local and regional contexts and needs, the strategic framework provides an emerging consensus on how we need to move SMS conceptualization, planning and development forward. The framework provides definitions of self-management (SM) and SMS, a collective vision, eight guiding principles and seven strategic directions. The framework combines important and relevant SM issues into a strategic document that provides potential value to the SMS field by helping decision-makers plan SMS initiatives that reflect local and regional needs and by catalyzing and expanding our thinking about the SMS field in relation to system thinking; shared responsibility; health equity and ethical issues. The framework was developed with the understanding that our knowledge and experience of SMS is continually evolving and that it should be modified and adapted as more evidence is available, and approaches in SMS advance.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseasePolicy MakingSelf-ManagementConsensusGlobal HealthHumansSocial SupportVulnerable Populationschronic illnesscollaborationdisease managementframework

Identifiers

PMID27242377
PMCPMC5914450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.