Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27242193›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2016

The Diverse Structures and Functions of Surfactant Proteins.

Marieke Schor, Jack L Reid, Cait E MacPhee, Nicola R Stanley-Wall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Structural changes of TasA in biofilm formation ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Frog foams and natural protein surfactants.Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects · 2017
    Article
  6. Bifunctionality of a biofilm matrix protein controlled by redox state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marieke SchorSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jack L ReidSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Cait E MacPheeSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: cait.macphee@ed.ac.uk.
Nicola R Stanley-WallSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. Electronic address: n.r.stanleywall@dundee.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I019464/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006804/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface tension at liquid-air interfaces is a major barrier that needs to be surmounted by a wide range of organisms; surfactant and interfacially active proteins have evolved for this purpose. Although these proteins are essential for a variety of biological processes, our understanding of how they elicit their function has been limited. However, with the recent determination of high-resolution 3D structures of several examples, we have gained insight into the distinct shapes and mechanisms that have evolved to confer interfacial activity. It is now a matter of harnessing this information, and these systems, for biotechnological purposes.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationProteinsSurface-Active AgentsSurface TensionProteinsSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID27242193
PMCPMC4929970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.