Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27241954›Full record

ArticlePathogens and global health2016

Characteristics of and factors associated with dengue vector breeding sites in the City of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Valérie R Louis, Carlos Alberto Montenegro Quiñonez, Pad Kusumawathie, Paba Palihawadana, Sakoo Janaki, Yesim Tozan, Ruwan Wijemuni, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Hasitha A Tissera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens and global health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of a Dengue Virus Outbreak in Rosso, Senegal 2021.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Introgression of theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Preventing Dengue Epidemics during the COVID-19 Pandemic.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Valérie R Louisa Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University , Heidelberg , Germany.
Carlos Alberto Montenegro Quiñoneza Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University , Heidelberg , Germany.
Pad Kusumawathieb Regional Malaria Office , Ministry of Health , Kandy , Sri Lanka.
Paba Palihawadanac Epidemiology Unit , Ministry of Health , Colombo , Sri Lanka.
Sakoo Janakid National Dengue Control Unit , Ministry of Health , Colombo , Sri Lanka.
Yesim Tozana Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University , Heidelberg , Germany.
Ruwan Wijemunif Department of Public Health , Colombo Municipal Council , Colombo , Sri Lanka.
Annelies Wilder-Smitha Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University , Heidelberg , Germany.
Hasitha A Tisserac Epidemiology Unit , Ministry of Health , Colombo , Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDengue has emerged as a major public health problem in Sri Lanka. Vector control at community level is a frequent and widespread strategy for dengue control. The aim of the study was to assess Aedes mosquito breeding sites and the prevention practices of community members in a heavily urbanized part of Colombo.

methodsA cross-sectional entomological survey was conducted from April to June 2013 in 1469 premises located in a subdistrict of the City of Colombo. Types of breeding sites and, where found, their infestation with larvae or pupae were recorded. Furthermore, a questionnaire was administered to the occupants of these premises to record current practices of dengue vector control.

resultsThe surveyed premises consisted of 1341 residential premises and 110 non-residential premises (11 schools, 99 work or public sites), 5 open lands, and 13 non-specified. In these 1469 premises, 15447 potential breeding sites suitable to host larvae of pupae were found; of these sites18.0% contained water. Among the 2775 potential breeding sites that contained water, 452 (16.3%) were positive for larvae and/or pupae. Schools were associated with the proportionally highest number of breeding sites; 85 out of 133 (63.9%) breeding sites were positive for larvae and/or pupae in schools compared with 338 out of 2288 (14.8%) in residential premises. The odds ratio (OR) for schools and work or public sites for being infested with larvae and/or pupae was 2.77 (95% CI 1.58, 4.86), when compared to residential premises. Occupants of 80.8% of the residential premises, 54.5% of the schools and 67.7% of the work or public sites reported using preventive measures. The main prevention practices were coverage of containers and elimination of mosquito breeding places. Occupants of residential premises were much more likely to practice preventive measures than were those of non-residential premises (OR 2.23; 1.49, 3.36).

conclusionSchools and working sites were associated with the highest numbers of breeding sites and lacked preventive measures for vector control. In addition to pursuing vector control measures at residential level, public health strategies should be expanded in schools and work places.

Indexed as

AdultAedesAnimalsBreedingChildCross-Sectional StudiesDengueDengue VirusFemaleHousingHumansInsect VectorsLarvaMaleMosquito ControlPublic HealthAedes mosquitoesBreeding sitesDenguePreventionSchoolsVectorVector control

Identifiers

PMID27241954
PMCPMC4894263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.