Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27241911›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2016

In vivo confinement promotes collective migration of neural crest cells.

András Szabó, Manuela Melchionda, Giancarlo Nastasi, Mae L Woods, Salvatore Campo, Roberto Perris, Roberto Mayor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Identification of neural crest and melanoma cancer cell invasion and migration genes using high-throughput screening and deep attention networks.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Collective migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Galvanotactic directionality of cell groups depends on group size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

András SzabóDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England, UK.
Manuela MelchiondaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England, UK.
Giancarlo NastasiDepartment of Biochemical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Images, School of Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Mae L WoodsDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England, UK.
Salvatore CampoDepartment of Biochemical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Images, School of Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Roberto PerrisCenter for Molecular and Translational Oncology, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy.
Roberto MayorDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England, UK r.mayor@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council M008517Medical Research Council J000655Medical Research Council M010465Wellcome Trust 329968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective cell migration is fundamental throughout development and in many diseases. Spatial confinement using micropatterns has been shown to promote collective cell migration in vitro, but its effect in vivo remains unclear. Combining computational and experimental approaches, we show that the in vivo collective migration of neural crest cells (NCCs) depends on such confinement. We demonstrate that confinement may be imposed by the spatiotemporal distribution of a nonpermissive substrate provided by versican, an extracellular matrix molecule previously proposed to have contrasting roles: barrier or promoter of NCC migration. We resolve the controversy by demonstrating that versican works as an inhibitor of NCC migration and also acts as a guiding cue by forming exclusionary boundaries. Our model predicts an optimal number of cells in a given confinement width to allow for directional migration. This optimum coincides with the width of neural crest migratory streams analyzed across different species, proposing an explanation for the highly conserved nature of NCC streams during development.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCell AggregationComputer SimulationFemaleFibronectinsModels, BiologicalNeural CrestTime-Lapse ImagingVersicansXenopusFibronectinsVersicans

Identifiers

PMID27241911
PMCPMC4896058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.